PELAKSANAAN PERMA NO 2 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PENYESUAIAN BATASAN TINDAK PIDANA RINGAN DAN JUMLAH DENDA DALAM KUHP PADA TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN (STUDI KASUS POLRESTA PADANG)

Ikrar Juliando Ikrar Juliando

Abstract


ABSTRACT

Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2012 provides a stipulation on the value of goods or money that becomes the object of theft, fraud, embezzlement, and staking the case is not more than Rp. 2,500.0000 was processed with a quick check event, in the case of antique motorcycle theft by 2 youths. The issues that will be discussed are: (1) How is the implementation of PERMA No. 2 Year 2012 in Polresta Padang? (2) What factors are the obstacles and supporting investigators in the implementation of PERMA No. 2 of 2012 in Polresta Padang? (3) How to overcome obstacles faced by investigators in the implementation of PERMA No. 2 of 2012? The method used is sociological juridical, data source that is primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques used are interviews and documents. The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively. Conclusion: (1) Implementation of PERMA No 2 Year 2012 is solved by using restorative justice approach. (2) The inhibiting factor is the difficulty of valuing the price of goods whose value is no standardization, the PERMA rule does not change the content of the Criminal Code, the lack of understanding of the public and the investigator against PERMA No. 2 of 2012. Supporting factors are acknowledgment and remorse of the perpetrator, the condition of the perpetrator and the number of acts Criminal perpetrators committed, investigators remain professional and proportionate. (3) How to overcome obstacles that is to coordinate with the operation of POLRI, disseminate telegram to the ranks, conduct socialization, conduct guidance to investigators, conduct in-depth investigation, mediate the penal

 

Keywords: Implementation, Mild Crimes, Penalties, Theft


References


Daftar pustaka

A. Buku

A. Zainal Abidin Farid, 1995, Hukum Pidana I, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Adami Chazawi, 2003, Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Benda, Bayu Media, Malang

AmiruddindanZainalAsikin, 2012, PengantarMetodePenelitianHukum, Raja GrafindoPersada, Jakarta

Andi Hamzah, 2007, KUHP & KUHAP, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta

Kansil, 2002, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta

Lamintang, 1984, Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Baru, Bandung

Leden Marpaung, 1991, Unsur-unsur Yang Dapat Dihukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Moeljatno, 1985, Fungsi dan Tujuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Bina Aksara, Jakarta

P.A.F Lamintang dan Theo Lamintang, 2009, Delik-delik Khusus Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Kekayaan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Roeslan Saleh, 1983, Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dua Pengertian Dasar Dalam Hukum Pidana, Aksara Baru, Jakarta

Sudarto, 1990, Hukum Pidana I Cetakan Kedua, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

Suharto RM, 2002, Hukum Pidana Materil, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Sutrisno Hadi, 1993, Metode Research, Andi Offset, Yogyakarta

Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 2003, Tindak-tindak Pidana Tertentu di Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung

B. Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana

Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan dan Jumlah Denda dalam KUHP

C. Sumber Lain

I.A Budivaja dan Y. Bandrio, Eksistensi Pidana Denda Dalam Penerapannya, Jurnal Hukum, Volume XIX, Nomor 19, 2010,

Mencuri 3 buah kakao nenek minah di hukum 1 bulan 15 hari, http://www.detiknews.com


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.