KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN SAKSI VERBALISAN (SAKSI PENYIDIK) SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DI PERSIDANGAN DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PIDANA (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Klas IA Padang)

Chelshi Chelshi Mayola

Abstract


 

ABSTRAK

The verbal witness is an investigator who later becomes a witness to a criminal case because the defendant states the Minutes of Examination (hereinafter referred to as BAP) has been made under pressure (coercion). Evidence is the most important part in the process of examination in criminal justice in Indonesia, both at the level of investigation and at the level of the trial. The evidence itself is set in Article 184 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. To prove one's actions must have at least 2 valid evidence. So also the judge, in proving a defendant's actions other than minimal proven with 2 valid evidence also based on the judge's conviction. (1) How is the strength of proof of the witness of the verbalist (witness of the investigator) as evidence in the trial (Case Study in the Class Court of IA Padang) (2) How is the judge considering the verdict against the verbalist witness (witness investigator). This study uses a kind of sociological juridical research. Data used primary data and secondary data. Data obtained through interviews and document studies. Data were analyzed qualitatively. From the research, it can be concluded: (1) The strength of verbal witness proof as evidence in the trial in the verification of a criminal case in the First Class Court of Padang is that before the examination must be sworn and the testimony of the witness of verbalism must be connected with other evidence. (2) The judge in considering the decision on the testimony of the witness of verbalism shall be guided by Article 185 paragraph (6) of KUHAP, namely the correspondence of witness testimony with each other, with other evidence and the way of life of a witness. Key words : Proof, Witness, Verbalist, Proof Tool




















































































References


Daftar Pustaka

Amirudin Zainal Asikin, 2003, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Andi Hamzah, 2008, Hukum Acara Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Bambang Sunggono, 2003, Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Lilik Mulyadi, 2007, Hukum Acara Pidana: Normatif, Teoritis, Praktik dan permasalahannya, PT. Alumni Bandung

M. Yahya Harahap, 2006, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto, 2005, PengantarPenelitian Hukum, UI-Press, Jakarta.

Undang-Undang Nomor. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian

Al Badar net, Pengertian, Tugas dan Wewenang Kepolisian http://al-badar.net/pengertian-tugas-dan-wewenang-kepolisian-polri/

Anonim,Definisi Saksi dan Korban, ihttp://www.suduthukum.com/2016/09/definisi-saksi-dan-korban.html

Diana Kusumasari, FungsiSaksiVerbalisan,http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt4f7260564b14d/fungsi-saksi-verbalisan

Rahmat Yudistiawan, Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan https://rahmatyudistiawan.wordpress.com/.../penyelidikan-dan-penyidikan-oleh-rahm..

Tri Jata Ayu pramesti, Apakah Penyidik dapat dijadikan saksi di persidangan?, http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt569a106763c69/apakah-penyidik-dapat-dijadikan-saksi-di-persidangan


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.