PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENERAPAN PIDANA PENJARA TERHADAP ADVOKAT YANG MERINTANGI PROSES PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI ( STUDI PERKARA NOMOR 684 K/Pid.Sus/2009 )
Abstract
ABSTRACTEvery person who intentionally prevents, impedes or thwarts directly or indirectly investigations, prosecutions and hearings at a court hearing is threatened by Article 21 of the Corruption Eradication Act. An advocate who commits an offense has been convicted based on Decision number 684 k / pid.sus / 2009. Formulation of the problem: 1) What is the criminal application of the lawyer who hinders the process of investigating corruption in the case number 684 k / pid.sus / 2009? 2) What is the judge's consideration in applying imprisonment to an advocate who hinders the process of investigating corruption in the case number 684 k / pid.sus / 2009? This study used a normative approach. The data source used was secondary data. Secondary data consists of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Data was collected by document study, and then analyzed qualitatively. Conclusion of research results: (1) Advocates who hinder the investigation of criminal acts of corruption in Decision No. 684 k / Pid. Ss / 2009 was sentenced to 3 years imprisonment. This decision is heavier than the decision of the high court judge. (2). Judges' consideration in deciding cassation is based on juridical and non-judicial considerations.Keywords: Judge, Prison, Advocate, Corruption
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
A. Buku-buku
Adam Chazawi, 2006 , Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indoesia, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta
Andi Hamzah, 1991, Korupsi Dalam Pengelolaan Proyek, Akademik Pressindo, Jakarta
Bambang Suggono, 2013, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta
Frans Hendra Winarta, 1995, Advokat Indonesia Citra, Idealisme dan Keprihatinan, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta
Henry Canpbell Black, 1968, Black’s Law Dictionary Fourth Edition, West Publishing. Co., St. Paul Minn.
Rusli Muhammad, 2007, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung
Lilik Mulyadi, 2007, Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana, PT. RemajaRosda Karya, Bandung
M Yahya Harahap, 2000, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Ed-2, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Rahmat Rosyadi dan Sri Hartini, 2004, Advokat Dalam Prespektif Islam dan Hukum Positif, Ghalia Indonesia,Jakarta
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1990, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia,Jakarta
Roni Wiyanto, 2012, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia, C.V. mandar Maju, Bandung
Tim Penyusun,2008, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Pusat Bahasa, Jakarta
B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-undang nomor 8 tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana
Undang-undang nomor 31 tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2011 tentang Bantuan Hukum.
C. Sumber Lain
Sudut Hukum, 2016, Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim, http://www.suduthukum.com/2016/11/dasar-pertimbangan-hakim.html.
