ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN OLEH PENGADILAN NEGERI PADANG ( STUDI KASUS PERKARA NOMOR: 3/PDT.SUS-BPSK/2019/PN PDG)
Abstract
The Consumer Protection Act explains the legal consequences of the issuance of the BPSK decision, that the decision of the BPSK assembly is final and binding, meaning that there is no longer any legal effort to appeal and appeal at the non-litigation court level. However, if there are parties who object to the BPSK decision, then they can submit an objection to the District Court no later than 14 working days after notification of the decision. As happened in the Padang city BPSK verdict Number: 10 / PTS / BPSK-PDG / SBR / M / XII / 2018 which was canceled by the Padang District Court through the case verdict Number: 3 / PDT.Sus-BPSK / 2019 / PN Pdg. The problems in this study are regarding (1) What is the basis of the lawsuit and the basis for consideration of the cancellation of the BPSK arbitration award by the Padang District Court? (2) What are the legal consequences of canceling the BPSK arbitration award? This type of research is used normative legal research, the source of the data used is secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal material with document study data collection techniques, and analyzed qualitatively. Conclusions of the study (1) The basis of the lawsuit and the basis for consideration of the cancellation of the arbitration decision of BPSK by the Padang District Court according to the juridical aspect is based on facts, witness testimony, in which one of the objections has been proven the reason for the objection, therefore the petition for the Objection of the Objection have legal grounds to be granted. (2) due to the legal cancellation of the BPSK arbitration award, the BPSK decision was null and void by law then a new decision was made by the District Court Number: 3 / Pdt.Sus-BPSK / 2019 / PN / Pdg.
Keywords:Cancellation,Decision,Court,Arbitration
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
A. Buku-buku
Ahmadi Miru & Sutarman Yodo, 2005, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta
Bambang Sugeng A.S., & Sujayadi, 2012, Pengantar Hukum Acara Perdata, Pranada media Group
Bambang Sunggono, 1996, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, PT Raja grafindo persada, Jakarta
Duwi Handoko, 2019, Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen, Ahwa dan Hawa, Pekanbaru
Gunawan Widjaja & Ahmad Yani,2003, Hukum Arbitrase, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta
Intan Nur Rahmawati, &Rukiyah Lubis, 2014, Win-win Solution Sengketa Konsumen, Medpress digital, Yogyakarta
M. Nur Rasaid, 2003,Hukum Acara Perdata, Sinar Grafika Offset, Jakarta
M. Syamsudin Salman Lutha, 2018,Mahir Menulis Studi Kasus hukum , Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta
Moh. Taufik Makarao, 2009, Pokok-pokok Hukum Acara Perdata, Cetakan Ke-2, Alumni, Bandung
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2012, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
Zainuddin Ali, 2009, Metode Penelitian Hukum,Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
B. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPER).
Undang-undang Nomor 48 tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-undang Nomor 8 tahun 2004 tentang Peradilan Umum.
Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
Putusan Perkara Nomor: 3/Pdt.sus-BPSK/2019/PN Pdg
Putusan Perkara Nomor 10/PTS/BPSK-PDG/SBR/M/XII/2018
C. Sumber Lain
Media Sosial, 2014, Studi Dokumen, http://nashiha-sosmed.blogspot.co.id/2014/07/studi-dokumen-kajian-dokumen.html, (diakses pada hari Senin tanggal 13 april 2019, Pukul 13.20 WIB)
Edwin Kritanto, Peran Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen dalam menyelesaiakan sengketa konsumen http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/6627/1/JURNAL.pdf
