KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ALAT BUKTI DIGITAL DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi PutusanNomor : 040/PID.SUS/TPK/2017/PN. JKT.PST. dan39/PID.SUS/TPK/2018/PN. JKT.PST.)
Abstract
Abstract
Digital evidence tools are also described in Article 26a Act No. 20 year 2001 about criminal acts of corruption as a tool of other evidence. Digital evidence is itself a part of the evidence Guide. In the crime of corruption, often found the presence of digital evidence in the evidence brought by the Attorney dipersidangan. In this case the defendant RAC and SAT proven criminal offence of corruption and the public prosecutor brings digital evidence as evidence in the trial instructions. The outline of the research issues are: 1) how can the power of proof of digital evidence tools? 2) how the application of the criminal in the case No: 040/PID. SUS/TPK/2017/PN.JKT.PST dan39/PID.SUS/TPK/2018/PN.JKT.PST. This research used the juridical normative approach. The data used were secondary data in the form of legal materials. Data collected with the documents, studies and analyzed qualitatively. Based on research can be concluded that: 1) digital evidence Tools do not have the force of law for the judge to decide the matter, 2) criminal matters on both the Application is in compliance with the elements of the legislation in force, with the first verdict , are convicted to jail for 5 years and a verdicts of both are convicted to jail for 13 years.
Keywords: Proof, Evidence, Digital, Corruption
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
a. Buku- buku
Andi Hamzah, 2002, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Edisi Revisi, PT. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
_______________, 2006, Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Internasional, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Bambang Sunggono,2013,Metodologi Penelitian Hukum,Rajawali Persada,Jakarta
Evi Hartanti, 2007, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafik, Jakarta.
Erdianto Effendi, 2011, Hukum Pidana Indonesia - Suatu Pengantar, PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Hari Sasangka danLily Rosita.2003, Komentar Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) Buku Pedoman Mahasiswa danPraktisi, Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
Lilik Mulyadi, 2007, Hukum Acara Pidana Normatif, Teoretis, Praktik danPermasalahannya, P.T. Alumni, Bandung,
M. Yahya Harahap, 2015, Pembahasan Permasalahan danPenerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding,Kasasi, danPeninjauan Kembali,Edisi kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Suratman, Philips Dillah, 2014, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Alfabeta:Bandung, Cetakan Kedua.
b.Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1891 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi danTransaksi Elektronik.
c. Sumber Lain
Media Sosial, 2014, StudiDokumen, http://nashiha-sosmed.blogspot.co.id/2014/07/studi-dokumen-kajian-dokumen.html
