PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI BERBENTUK PENGGELAPAN DALAM JABATAN (Studi Kasus Putusan:No129/PID.SUS-TPK/2014/PN.SMG) ARTIKEL
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Crimes of corruption take the form of embezzlement in employment made by the defendant’s name TS organized in Article 8 of the Law No 31 of 1999 which has been amended and supplemented by RI Law. No. 20 of 2001 concerning corruption has been appropriate because it has met the requirements of criminal corruption, with case number : 129/PID.SUS-TPK/2014/PN.SMG perpetrators of criminal corupption sentenced to 3 years in prison. Problems: 1)How’s the evidence to crimes ofcorruption take the form of embezzlement in employmentto case number:129/PID.SUS-TPK/2014/PN.SMG? 2)How a criminal application of a corruption crime from embezzlement in employment to the verdict? a kind of normative law study. A secondary source of primary secondary and tartiary. The secondary research consists of object primary, secondary, tertiary. Data collection techniques used analyze qualitative. A summary of research results 1) conclusion of research results.1) Proof of Corruption Prison by TS is that the judge puts the prison for 3 (three) years in the jail, a fine of Rp.100,000,000 (one million rupiah), a subsidiary of 3 (three) months in confinement according to the judge's request to obtain sufficient equipment. 2) Application of the murder to the decision with the Panel of Judges who chose the second indictment, namely replacing Article 8 of the Law. 31 of 1999 which has been amended and supplemented by RI Law. No. 20 of 2001 concerning corruption has been appropriate because it has met the requirements of criminal corruption acts in the article..
Key words : Proof, corruption, decision,embezzlement in office
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Adami Chazawi, 2005, Hukum Pidana Formil dan Materiil Korupsi di Indonesia, Bayu Media,Malang
Andi Hamzah, 1995, Delik-delik Tersebar Di Luar KUHP dengan Komentar, Pradnya Paramita Jakarta
Ermansyah Djaja, 2010, Membetarantas Korupsi Bersama KPK, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
,2010, Meredesain Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 012-016-019/PPU-IV/2006, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
,2010,Tipologi Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Evi Hartati, 2009, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Hassan Shadily, 1983, Ensiklopedi Indonesia, Ichtiar Baru-Van Hoeve, Jakarta.
Moeljatno, 2008, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Mulyadi, 2007, Hukum Acara Pidana (Normatif, Teoretik, Praktik dan Permasalahannya),P.T. Alumni, Bandung.
R. Soesilo, 1996, Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) Serta Komentar –Komentarnya, CV Politeia, Bogor.
Rachmat Trijono, 2016, Kamus Hukum, Pustaka Kemang, Jakarta.
Wojo Wasito, 2001, Kamus Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Yogyakarta.
Undang-undang Dasar Tahun 1945
Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Undang-undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001
