DISPARITAS PIDANA PENJARA DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The disparity of imprisonment in corruption brings problems in law enforcement in Indonesia. This is a form of freedom of judges in issuing decisions, as stipulated in Article 1 number (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. In case No.41 / Pid.Sus / TPK / 2018 / PN.JKT.PST was sentenced to prison for 4 years 6 months and No.65 / Pid.Sus / TPK / 2018 / PN.JKT.PST was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. Formulation of the problem is 1) What is the disparity of imprisonment in corruption cases? 2) What is the judge's consideration of the disparity of imprisonment in corruption cases? This type of research is normative juridical. Data sources include secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Data collection technique is the study of documents. Data were analyzed qualitatively. Conclusions of the results of the study 1) Disparity of imprisonment in corruption cases, which can be seen from the striking difference in imprisonment decided by the judge and the difference in state losses incurred. 2) Judicial considerations judicially: The defendant is proven to have violated Article 2 of Law Number 31 of 1999 which has been amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption. Non-juridical consideration: the defendant admits his actions, being polite.
Â
 Keywords: Disparity, Criminal, Prison, Corruption
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Ahmad Rifai, 2010, Penerapan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progressif, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Allan Manson, 2001, The Law of Sentencing, Irwin Law, Jakarta.
Andi Hamzah, 2006, Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan International, PT.Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Bambang Sunggono, 2015, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.
Eddy Djunaedy,1996, Beberapa Pedoman Pemidanaan dan Pengamatan Narapidana, Umika Atma Jaya, Jakarta.
Evi Hartanti, 2008, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, PT.Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Lilik Mulyadi, 2007, Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Normatif, Teoritis, Praktik dan Masalahnya, P.T Alumni, Bandung.
M.Dhana S.Ginting, 2018, Analisis Dispaaritas dan Rendahnya Vonis Pidana Kasus Korupsi di Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, 1984, Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Penerbit Alumni, Bandung.
Nicolas Hany, 2015, Disparitas Pidana Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Semarang, Yogyakarta.
Nimerodi Gulo dan Ade Kurniawan Muharram, 2018, Disparitas Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana, Jurnal Masalah-masalah hukum, Semarang.
Undang – undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 yang telah diubah dengan Undang – Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang – undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, 2019, Laporan Tahunan, http;//KPK.co.id.
