PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA HAK CIPTA MENYIARKAN GAMBAR/SUARA TANPA IZIN DARI PEMILIK HAK (Studi Perkara Nomor 130/Pid.B/2013/PN.Parepare)

Authors

  • Kurnia Tri Kurnia Tri Y

Abstract

Abstract

Copyright is an exclusive right for the creator, regulated in Act Number 19 of 2002 concerning Copyright. In case number 130 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN.Parepare A.H has broadcast the English League match, the licensee is PT. MNC Sky Vision. The defendant violated Article 72 paragraph (5) of the Copyright Law, the judge handed down the sentence for 5 months. Formulation of the problems 1) How is the application of criminal by the judge against the perpetrators broadcast pictures without permission of the rights owner in case number 130 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN.Parepare? 2) How is the judge's consideration in the application of a criminal for the offender broadcasting a picture without permission of the rights owner in case number 130 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN.Parepare ?. The research method is normative juridical. Data sources are secondary data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques through document study, the data were analyzed qualitatively. Conclusions of the result 1) The application of criminal by the judge against the perpetrators broadcast the picture without permission of the rights owner in case number 130 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN.Parepare includes elements of who committed, unlawful acts, the existence of mistakes, being able to be responsible, the existence of sanctions criminal. 2) Judge's considerations in applying criminal law to the perpetrators broadcast pictures without the permission of the right owner in case number 130 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN.Parepare in prosecuting criminal cases considering several things, namely juridical considerations in the form of public prosecutors 'charges, public prosecutors' demands, evidence and evidence. Non-juridical considerations in the form of incriminating and mitigating matters.

 

Keywords: Judge, Copyright, Broadcast, Permit

References

A. Buku

Adami Chazawi, 2019, Tindak Pidana Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HaKI), Media Nusa Creative, Malang

Burhan Ashofa, 2013, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Danrivanto Budhijanto, 2013, Hukum Telekomunikasi, Penyiaran & Teknologi Informasi, PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Eddy Damian, 2014, Hukum Hak Cipta, PT. Alumni, Bandung.

Judhariksawan, 2010, Hukum Penyiaran, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Margono, 2019, Asas Keadilan Kemanfaatan & Kepastian Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2015, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Sophar Maru Hutagalung, 2012, Hak Cipta Kedudukan & Peranannya dalam Pembagunan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Tim Visi Yustisia, 2015, Panduan Resmi Hak Cipta, Visimedia, Jakarta.

Waluyadi, 1999, Pengetahuan Dasar Hukum Acara Pidana, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 81 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2002 tentang Hak Cipta

Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 tentang Penyiaran

C. Sumber Lain

Andi Akbar, 2017, Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana, https://seniorkampus.blogspot.com/2017/09/pertimbangan-hakim-dalam-menjatuhkan.html.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-25