PENERAPAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MEMPERNIAGAKAN KOMODO SEBAGAI HEWAN YANG DILINDUNGI (Studi Perkara Nomor 1405/PID.B/LH/2019/PN SBY)
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The Komodo dragon is one of the protected animals in Indonesia. In the crime of commercializing the Komodo dragon as a protected animal it is regulated in Article 21 Paragraph (2) letters a and b of Law Number 5 of 1990. The defendant is proven guilty of committing a criminal act Komodo dragons, provided that the criminal provisions provided for in Article 40 paragraph (2) are sentenced to a maximum imprisonment of 5 (five) years and a maximum fine of Rp. 100,000,000.00 (one hundred million rupiah). The Komodo dragon case was tried in Surabaya District Court. The problems are: 1) How is the application of the crime against the perpetrators of the crime of commercializing Komodo dragons as protected animals in case Number 1405 / Pid.B / LH / 2019 / PN.Sby? 2) How is the judge's consideration in imposing a criminal action against a criminal offense as a Komodo dragon as a protected animal in case Number 1405 / Pid.B / LH / 2019 / PN.Sby? This study uses a normative juridical approach, using data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques through the study of documents and analyzed qualitatively. Conclusion of the results of the study: 1) the sentence imposed by the judge is still below the maximum criminal sentence. Then, the judge's decision is not the same as the demands of the Public Prosecutor. 2) In convicting a criminal, the judge refers to juridical considerations namely, the indictment of the Public Prosecutor, the defendant's statement, witness testimony, evidence and non-juridical considerations namely, matters which incriminate and alleviate
Keywords: Criminal, Komodo, Animal, Protected
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
A .BUKU
Andi Hamzah, 2008, Terminologi Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Bambang Sunggono, 2013, Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum, Rajawali Persada, Jakarta
Chairul Huda, 2006, Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kealahan. Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Kencana Prenada Media, Jakarta
Leden Marpaung, 1996 †Tindak Pidana Hutan, Hasil Hutan, dan Satwaâ€. Erlangga, Jakarta
Mahrus Ali, 2015, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Moeljanto, 2008, Asas-Asas HukumPidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro. 1990, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta
Saifullah, 20017, Hukum Lingkungan dan Konservasi Keaneka Ragaman Hayati,Malang Pers, Malang
Slamet Khoiri, 2003, Satwa liar yang Dilindungi, Sinar Utama, Jakarta
Supardi, 2008, Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, SinarGrafika, Jakarta
B.PeraturanPerundang-Undangan
Undang-undang No. 5 Tahun 1990 tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya
Keputusan Presiden Nomor 4 Tahun 1993 tentang “Komodo Sebagai Satwa Nasionalâ€
C . SUMBER LAIN
Diwarta, 2012. Ciri-Ciri Komodo. https://www.diwarta.com/2012/06/25/ciri-ciri-komodo-dan-pengetahuannya.html
Rosek Nursahid, 1999. Satwa Liar di Indonesia, Profauna Indonesia, https://www.profauna.net/id/fakta-satwa-liar-di-indonesia#.XddW3JMzbIU
Ray Pratama, 2012, Pengertian, Jenis-jenis, dan Tujuan Pemidanaan https://raypratama.blogspot.com/2012/02/pengertian-jenis-jenis-dan-tujuan.html
Takdir Rahmadi, 2015. Lingkungan di Indonesia,Rajawali Pers, jakarta hlm 199, http://rajagrafindo.co.id/produk/hukum-lingkungan-di-indonesia
Handar Subhandi, 2016, pengertian satwa dan satwa liar. http//handarsubhandi.blogspot.com/2016/12/pengertian-satwa-dan-satwa-liar.htmi