PERTIMBANGANHAKIMDALAMMENJATUHKANPUTUSANTERHADAP 1PELAKUTINDAKPIDANAKEHUTANANYANGMENGANGKUT, 1MENGUASAI,DANMEMILIKIHASILHUTANYANGTIDAKDILENGKAPI 1SURATKETERANGANSAHNYAHASILHUTAN(SKSHH)

Authors

  • Veby Yunaldi Tanjung Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Uning Pratimaratri Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Syafridatati Universitas Bung Hatta

Keywords:

Keywords: Forest Products, Verdict, SKSHH, Forestry

Abstract

Forestry crime is regulated in Article 12 e of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Damage: transporting, controlling, and owning forest products without a forest product legality certificate. Formulation of the problem: 1) How is the application of criminal action against perpetrators of forestry crimes who transport, control and own forest products that are not equipped with a forest product legality certificate? 2) What is the legal basis for the judge in imposing a criminal offense against the perpetrator of forestry crime who transports, controls and owns forest products that are not equipped with a forest product legality certificate?.Type of normative juridical research. The source used is secondary data consisting of primary law, secondary law, and tertiary law. The collection technique is done by means of document study, conclusions. 1) Imposing criminal acts against forestry criminal offenders who control, control and own forest products without a certificate of legality of forest products. It has been implemented properly and has been running smoothly, but it has not provided a deterrent effect because the charges and judges' decisions are still light. 2) The legal basis for the judge in imposing crimes against perpetrators of forestry crimes who transport, control and own forest products is not equipped with a forest product legality certificate. The judge decided based on juridical and non-juridical considerations in this case, burdensome and mitigating considerations.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

A. Buku-Buku

Alam Setia. 2000, Hukum Lingkungan Konservasi Hutan. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Andi Hamzah. 2017, Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

BambangWaluyo, 2004. PidanadanPemidanaan, CetakanKe 2, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Bambang Sunggono, 2015, Metode Penelitian Hukum, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

King Fisal, 2017, PolitikHukum Kekuasaan Kehakim Indonesia, UII Press. Yokyakarta

Marjohan JS Panjahitan, 2018, Membangun Badan Peradilan Yang Beradab, Berbudaya, dan Berkeadilan Menurut Teori, Praktik dan UUD 1945. Reka Cipta, Bandung.

Muhamad Erwin. 2019. Hukum Lingkungan. PT Refika Aditama. Bandung.

Salim, 2013, Dasar-dasar Hukum Kehutana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Sudirman Sultan, 2017, Dasar-dasar Pengamanan Hutan, Penerbit Ombak, Yokyakarta.

Zainal Arifin, 2016, Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia, Setara Press, Jatim.

B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-udang Republik Indonesia No 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2004 tentang Kehutanan.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2013 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Perusakan Hutan.

C. Sumber Lain

E Runtukahu – Lex et Societatis, 2014 Hambatan dan Upaya Pembenahan Pembenahan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan di Bidang Kehutanan. Joural.unsret.ac.id

Kiprah Mandiri B Side, 2014, Tinjauan Yuridis Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim dalam Menjatuhan Putusan Pidana Bersyarat. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/77621752.pdf.

MP Gunarto – Mimbar-Fakultas Hukum UGM 2009 Tujuan Pemidanaan.Journal.ugm.ac.id

ICR Tihirang – Lex Crimen, 2013 Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan di Bidang Kehutanan. Journal.unsrat.ac.id

Rusli Muhammad, 2007. Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. http://eprints.umm.ac.id/36240/3/jiptummpp-gdl-sitiwuland-47469-3-babii.pdf.

S Ante – Lex Crimen, 2013Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan dalam Acara Pidana. Journal.unsrat.ac.id

Downloads

Published

2020-10-22