PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERUSAKAN BARANG BUKTI PERATURAN SKOR SEPAK BOLA (STUDI PERKARA NOMOR : 463/PID.B/2019/PN JKT. SEL)

Abstract

criminal act damaging evidence is regulated by the 233 KUHP. This case involved JD being convicted under Article 233 in conjunction with Article 235 in conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and In the case of destroying evidence, the judge sentenced the defendant to imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months. 1) responsibility for the perpetrator of the criminal act of destroying evidence of the soccer score regulation in Case Number: 463 / PID.B / 2019 / PN. JKT SEL?: 2) What are the judges' considerations in charges the f destroying evidence of the soccer score regulation in Case Number: 463 / PID.B / 2019 / PN JKT. This study uses a normative juridical approach. Sources of data used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Data were collected by document study and analyzed qualitatively. Conclusions of the research results: 1) The criminal responsibility in this case imprisonment for the defendant 1 (one) year 6 (six) months: 2) The judges' considerations are based on juridical and non-juridical, if juridical the prosecutor general imprisonment demands 2 (years) 6 (six) months, while non-juridical panel of judges consider the mitigating circumstances and conditions that incriminate the defendant.