PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DIWILAYAH KASHMIR ANTARAINDIA DAN PAKISTAN DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL
Keywords:
Keywords: International Disputes, International Dispute Resolution, International Law, Khasmir RegionAbstract
The dispute over Kashmir was very influential and disturbing in the South Asian region, due to disputes between the two major countries namely India and Pakistan. The feud of two nations for the territory of Kashmir as the territory is still continuing and has attracted much attention from various countries in the dispute resolution efforts. The border sangketa of Kashmir has put a serious challenge for analysts as well as policymakers because the conflict is complex and heterogeneous. Kashmir was a predominantly Muslim region of the north, which had long been disputed after the British came out. Kashmir located on the border between India, Pakistan and China became a region of scramble by all three countries to this day, mainly India and Pakistan. The formulation of the problem to be researched is (1), How are dispute resolution rules between regions under international law. (2) How the dispute resolution in the region of the Khasmir occurred between India and Pakistan. The research is done in a descriptive, typology of this research is a normative juridical is a research law literature. Based on the results of the study can be concluded arrangements in international dispute resolution can be conducted by means of the settlement of a judicial institution consisting of (i) the arbitral tribunal, (ii) settlement through the International Mahkama (ICJ), (iii) Settlement of disputes through the International Criminal Court and with peaceful dispute resolution, the Kashmir territorial dispute occurred due to the conflict of the political interests of both countries and the powers manifested by unilateral claims from India or Pakistan so that the settlement decided the UN to try a new approach by sending UN representatives to India and Pakistan to find solutions that can be agreed upon by both countries. For this to see the better recticatory justice which can further trace the issue.References
Adolf, Huala. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional.Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2006
Amirudin dan Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Grafindo Jakarta, 2004
David J. Bederman, The Hague Peace Conference of 1899 and 1907
Ion Diaconu, Peaceful Settlement of Disputes Between States: History and Prospects, dalam Macdonald R. St. J. et. al., 1986, The Structure and Process of International Law: Essayss in Legal Philosophy Doctrine and Theory, Martinus Nijhoff
Mark W. Janis et. al., 1992, International Court for Twenty First Century, Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff
Louis B. Sohn dan J.G. Merrills, International Dispute Settlements, Grotius Publicsation, 1992
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.International Organization, Vol.52, No. 4, International Organization at Fifty: Exploration andContestation in the Study of World Politics (Autumn, 1998)
Konvensi Den Haag 1899 dan 1907
Pasal 33 Piagam PBB
Statute Mahkamah Internasional 1945
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.