PENERAPAN PIDANA TERHADAP KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi Putusan Nomor 812/PID.SUS/2010/PN.BJM)
Keywords:
Keywords:Application, Criminal, Corporate, CorruptionAbstract
Corporations can be convicted of crimes such as pt cases. GJW that commits corruption crimes contained in Article 2 paragraph (1) jo. Article 18 jo. Article 20 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes jo. Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 20 of 2001 on Changes to Law No. 31 of 1999 on Eradication of Corruption Crimes jo. Article 64 paragraph (1) of the P.S. One example is case number 812/PID. SUS/2010/PN.BJM. Formulation of the problem: 1) How is the criminal conviction against the corporation in the corruption crime verdict No.812/PID.SUS/2010/PN.BJM? 2) How is the judge's consideration in imposing criminal charges against corporations in the criminal offence of corruption verdict No.812/PID.SUS/2010/PN.BJM? Types of normative juridical research. The source of the data used is skunder data which is a primary, secondary and tertiary legal material, the technique of data collection is the study of documents. The data is analyzed in a quality. Concluded the results of the study: 1) Corporate criminal conviction in corruption crime No.812/PID.SUS/2010/PN.BJM has been found guilty of further corruption offences with a fine of Rp 1,300,000,000,000 and an additional six-month closure. 2) The judge's consideration is juridically considering the prosecutor's indictment, the defendant's description, sanctions description, evidence and articles in criminal law. In a non-juridical view of the incriminating: the defendant commits an unlawful act repeatedly and gives false information, the thing that relieves: nothing relieves.References
A. BUKU-BUKU
Andi Hamzah, 1996, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, PT. Sinar Grafika,Jakarta.
__________. 2006, Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Internasional, PT.Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
Bambang Sunggono, 2015, Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.
E.Utrecht, Moh. Soleh Djindang, 1983, Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia, Ichtiar Baru, Jakarta.
Evi Hartanti, 2008, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, PT.Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Muladi. 1985, Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Alumni. Bandung.
Molan dkk, 2003, Modern Criminal Law fifth edition, Cavendish Publishing Limited, London.
Muladi dan Dwidja Priyatno, 2010, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Penerbit Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Mahrus Ali, 2012, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, PT. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
R.Soesilo, 1995, KUHP Serta Komentar-komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Politeia, Bogor.
Rusli Muhammad, 2007 Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, 2007, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Grafiti Pers, Jakarta.
Zainudin Ali, 2013, Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantas Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang telah diperbarui dengan Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Sumber Lainnya
Handar Subhandi, 2019, Pengelompokan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut UU No.31 tahun 1999 jo UU No.20 Tahun 2001, http://handarsubhandi.blogspot. Com/2020/04/ pengelompokan-tindak-pidana-korupsi.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
