KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN AHLI DALAM PROSES PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi Putusan Nomor 32/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN-Pdg)

Authors

  • Natashia Sabilla Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Syafridatati Universitas Bung Hatta

Keywords:

Keywords: Evidence, Expert Statements, Corruption

Abstract

ABSTRACT Expert testimony in proving a criminal case is given by a person who has special expertise on a matter related to the criminal case being examined to clarify the case. The aim is to analyze the strength of proving expert testimony in terms of influencing the judge's conviction to make a decision on Decision Case Number 32/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/Pn-Pdg. This type of research uses normative legal research. The results of the study (1) Experts are used only if according to the public prosecutor the evidence is still lacking and for the panel of judges expert testimony if the information confirms the understanding of logical thinking and scientific understanding of the judge.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Buku-Buku

Bambang Sunggono, 2013. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto. 2010, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum,

Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20

Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas

Undang-Undang Nomor 31

Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-29

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2021): KUMPULAN EXSECUTIVE SUMMARY WISUDAWAN KE-76

Section

Executive Summary

License

Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.