PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU PEMERASAN DAN PENGANCAMAN MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 330/PID.SUS/2020/PN.PGP)
Keywords:
Keywords: accountability, blackmail, acidification, social mediaAbstract
ABSTRACT Extortion and acidification by using electronic media is regulated in the ITE Law. Examples of extortion and acidification cases using electronic media are contained in Verdict Number 330 / Pid.Sus / 2020 / PN.Pgp. The formulation of the problem: 1) How the criminal accountability of the accused of extortion and acidification cases using digital media (Verdict Number 330 / PID. SUS/2020/PN.Pgp?) 2) How is the judge's consideration when giving criminal to the accused of extortion and acidification cases using digital media (Verdict Number 330 / PID. SUS/2020/PN.Pgp?). This type of research is normative juridical. In this study the data source is sourced from secondary data (tertiary, secondary and primary legal materials. The method of data collection is carried out by document studies which if after collecting will be analyzed with qualitative methods. Conclusion: 1). The defendant was found guilty of fulfilling elements of criminal liability. The responsibility given is individual liability. (2) The judge considers juridically and non juridicallyReferences
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Barda Nawawi Arief, 2002, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
H.A. Zainal Abidin Farid,2010, Hukum Pidana 1, Sinar Greafika, Jakarta
Downloads
Published
2021-08-29
Issue
Section
Executive Summary
License
Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.