PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI DALAM PERKARA NOMOR 6/Pdt.G.S/2020/PN Pyh DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KELAS II I PAYAKUMBUH
Keywords:
judge's consideration, Agreement, DefaultAbstract
ABSTRACT PT BPR Gema Ampekkoto Sejahtera Pyk Branch felt aggrieved as result of default by Defendant who made loans to PT BPR Gema Ampekkoto Branch Payakumbuh Sejahtera. Problem formulation: 1) What are the forms of default that are fulfilled in Decision Number 6/Pdt.G.S/2020/PN Pyh? 2) What are the judges' considerations in deciding Case Number 6/Pdt.G.S/2020/PN Pyh? This type of research is normative juridical law research. The results of this study are: 1) The form of default that is fulfilled, namely the defendant fulfills the achievement but is not on time. 2) The judge's consideration in case Number 6/Pdt.G.S/2020/PN Pyh was incorrect, because the procedure for summoning the defendant was not in accordance with the laws and regulations.References
A. Buku-buku
Amirudin, ZainalIIasikin, I2006, PengantarI Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
I Ketut Oka Setiawan, 2015, Hukum Perikatan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Lukman Santoso Az, 2011, Hak dan Kewajian Hukumo Nasabaho Bank, Penerbit Pustaka Yustisia, Yogyakarta.
B. Peraturan Perundaang-undangan
Kitab Undang-Undang HukumPerdata (KUHPerdata) Kencana, Jakarta
Undang-Undang NoL10 TahunO 1998 tentang perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan
Undang-Undang Nomor I30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan iAlternatif Penyelesaian iSengketa.
C. Sumber Lain
Lukman, 2015, Analisis Altenatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Pihak Nasabah Dengan Industri Jasa Keuangan Pada Era Otoritas Jasa Keungan (OJK), Vol. 6, No.2
