PERANAN KETERANGAN SAKSI YANG MERINGANKAN SEEBAGAI ALLAT BUKTI DALAM PROSES PERSIDANGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN KELAPA SAWIT ( Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 193-pid.b-2018/pn-psb )

Abstract

ABSTRACT Eyewitnesses see the prosecution's detectives, prosecutors, and criminal case evidence, and they are able to view, witness, and to provide information about lawsuits that are experienced by themselves. Payments were softened by the defendant's witness. 193 / pid.b / 2018 / pn / psb, the defendant presented the de charge of 3 witnesses. Research problems: (1) What is the role of prosecution as evidence as evidence in palm oil theft from decision number 193 / pid.b / 2018 / PSB. (2) What is the examination of the judge that imposes criminal sanctions on criminal defendants? Decision No. 193/Pid.B/2018/PN/PSB on the crime of palm oil theft. This study uses a normative legal approach. Primary and secondary data are used as data sources. The results of the examination of the role of testimony are not binding on the judge in making a decision, and if the information cannot prove that the defendant is innocent, the defendant remains in court. Thee judges consiideration in deciding cases of palm oil theft cannot be separated from legal and illegal considerations.