TINJAUAN YURIDIS WANPRESTASI PERJANJIAN UTANG-PIUTANG ANTARA KREDITOR DENGAN DEBITOR (Studi Putusan Nomor:11/Pdt.G.S/2020/PN Bko

Abstract

The action of the defendant which is considered a breach because the defendant does not have good faith in carrying out his obligations which has made an agreement to return the remaining debt to the creditor. Problems studied:1. Legal consequences of breach on receivable and liability Agreements in Decision Number:11/Pdt.G.S/2020/PN Bko. 2. What is the Judge's consideration when making a decision against a party who is in breach in the breach Case in the Debt-Receivable Agreement in Decision Number:11/Pdt.G.S/2020/PN Bko? The research method that used is the normative juridical method. The research that was may be concluded: The legal consequences of Breach on Debt Agreements in Decision Number:11/Pdt.G.S/2020/PN Bko are that the defendants must return the remaining debt receivables that have been lent as agreed, in the amount of Rp. 69,600,000.00. to the plaintiff. The defendants are also required to pay court fees that arise in the case in the amount of Rp. 361,000.00. And the Judge's consideration when making a decision against the party who did breach in the breach Case in the Judgment receivable and liability Agreement Number:11/Pdt.GS/2020/PN Bko, the Judge underlies the legal relationship between the plaintiff and the defendants, examination in court of the evidences and witnesses that have been submitted by the plaintiff and the defendants, the answers of the defendants also justify the arguments of the lawsuit so that legal facts are obtained that the defendants have failed to fulfill their obligations that is paying off their debts to the plaintiff.