PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUGAN HIDUP (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 862 K/Pid.Sus/2010)
Abstract
The legal subject in the current criminal law is not limited to people, but it also includes the corporation. At UUPPLH Corporation classified as a legal subject, the development of environmental crime is often committed by a corporation. Problems which the author adopted in this study: (1) How to apply criminal liability to corporate actors (2) What form of criminal sanctions against the corporation as environmental criminals?. This study uses a normative approach. Legal materials studied is the Supreme Court ruling. No. 862K/Pid.Sus/2010. Legal materials were collected by the study documents. Data were analyzed qualitatively. From this studyit can be concluded: (1) corporate responsibility in environmental crime has been implemented, but does not eliminate personal responsibility. (2) The criminal sanction imposed by the Supreme Cour tagainst the corporation is in the form of a fine, if the fine is not paid then replaced with imprisonment undergone by the person representing the corporation.
Key word : accountability, corporation, performer, environmental.References
Alvi Syahrin, beberapa isu hukum lingkungan kepidanaan, PT. Sofmedia, Jakarta. 2009
SukandaHusen, , Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2009.
Gatot P. Soemartono, Sinar Grafika Jakarta, 2004
Regulasi (Undang-Undang, Putusan Pengadilan, dll)
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang pencemaran dan perusakan lingkungan hidup,perubahan atas UU No.23 tahun 1999
Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 863 K/Pid.Sus/2010.
Sumber lain :
Hasanudin Noo, Penerapan pertanggun jawaban korporasi dalam hukum pidana, http//com:/blog.
