PERSEPSI HAKIM TERHADAP DISPARITAS PIDANA PENJARA DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADANG

Authors

  • Annisa Novita Sari FH Bung Hatta
  • Syafridatati FH Bung Hatta

Keywords:

Disparity, Criminal, Prison, Corruption.

Abstract

Article 1 point 1 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power states that judges are free from pressure in rendering their decisions. Judges in imposing prison sentences on perpetrators of corruption, there is a disparity in the sentences of imprisonment for violating Article 2 of the Corruption Law in Case Number 14/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN.Pdg with Case Number 10/Pid. Sus-TPK/2021/PN. Pdg. The purpose of this study was to analyze the judge's perception of the disparity in imprisonment at the Padang Tipikor Court. This research is sociological juridical. The results of the study: (1) Disparity in the imposition of prison sentences by judges still occurs in corruption cases at the Padang Tipikor District Court. (2) The judge's perception of this matter is that it is natural that there is a difference in punishment.

References

A. Buku-Buku

Dwidja Priyatno, 2006. Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Ermansyah Djaja, 2009. Memberantas Korupsi Bersama KPK, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, 2012. Pendidikan Anti- Korupsi: Dampak Masif Korupsi, Dikti, Jakarta.

M. Dhana S. Ginting, 2018. Analisis Disparitas dan Rendahnya Vonis Pidana Kasus Korupsi di Sumatera Utara, Medan.

B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Downloads

Published

2023-02-27

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2023): WISUDAWAN PERIODE KE 79

Section

Executive Summary