EKSEKUSI PERAMPASAN ASET HASIL TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (STUDI KASUS DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI PADANG)
Keywords:
Execution, confiscation, assets, corruptionAbstract
Confiscation of assets is an action that can recover state financial losses as stipulated in Article 18 Paragraph (1) of the Corruption Law. Problem Formulation: 1) How is the implementation of the confiscation of assets resulting from corruption at the Padang District Attorney?; 2) What are the obstacles faced by the prosecutor's office in confiscating assets resulting from corruption at the Padang State Attorney's Office? Types of sociological juridical research; primary data sources (interviews); secondary data (Minutes of Confiscation of Assets resulting from Corruption); data collection techniques obtained through interviews and document studies; data analyzed qualitatively. Research results: 1) Execution is carried out through: asset tracing, freezing stage, blocking, confiscation stage, asset confiscation, auction; 2) Obstacles faced: internal (falsification in the name of asset ownership), external (third parties obstructing the execution process and the perpetrators of corruption have died).References
Buku-Buku
Bambang Waluyo, 2002, Penelitian Hukum Dalam Prakte, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Elwi Danil, 2011, Korupsi: Korupsi Tindak Pidana, dan Pemberantasannya, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Efi Laila Kholis, 2010, Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Korupsi, Solusi Publishing, Jakarta
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang diperbarui dengan Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001
Jurnal
Zaleka HG, Fitriati dan Deaf Wahyuni Ramadhani. 2016. Peranan Hakim Pengawasan Dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan Yang Memuat Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Padang. Universitas Bung Hatta. Padang.
Downloads
Published
2023-02-27
Issue
Section
Executive Summary