KAJIAN YURIDIS PUTUSAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA NOMOR 12/G/1995/PTUN-PDG DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA SURAT KEPUTUSAN KAN NAGARI GUGUK VIII KOTO KABUPATEN 50 KOTA PROVINSI SUMATERA BARAT

Abstract

Administrative disputes often occur to persons or civil legal entities who feel that their legal interests have been harmed due to the issuance of Administrative Decisions by Administrative Officials / Bodies. Law No. 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court in Article 47 states the authority of the Court to accept, examine, decide to resolve cases known as competence or authority to adjudicate. The main function of PTUN is to resolve legal disputes involving the government and individuals, business entities, or other parties related to government administrative actions or policies. The formulation of this research problem: 1) What are the legal consequences received by the litigants? 2) How is the consideration of PTUN Padang Judges in the Dispute Resolution of the KAN Nagari Guguk VIII Koto Decree? This research is normative juridical legal research. Data sources used Secondary Data, consisting of Primary Legal Materials, Secondary Legal Materials, and Tertiary Legal Materials. Data Collection Techniques using Document Studies, and Data Analysis using Qualitative Analysis. The results of the research are: 1) The legal consequences received by the litigants, both the Plaintiff and the Defendant in the Padang Administrative Court based on the verdict of the Padang Administrative Court Judges were won by the Plaintiff 2) The consideration of the PTUN Judge based on West Sumatra Regional Regulation No.13/1983 and West Sumatra Governor Instruction No.04/Inst/GDB/1994 is actually a valid decision and the state administrative agency or official must implement the decision.