KAJIAN YURIDIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR: 93/PID.B/LH/2023/PN PSB MENGENAI LEPAS DARI SEGALA TUNTUTAN HUKUM PADA TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP
Keywords:
judges' consideration, release decision, criminal offensesAbstract
The legal basis for a decision to be released from all charges is contained in Article 191 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code on the release decision. Release decisions handed down to defendants who violate the provisions of the Environmental Law, the subject matter of this case is a release decision handed down to defendants who violate Article 92 Paragraph (1) letter B, Article 93 Paragraph (1) letter A, Article 93 Paragraph (1) letter B of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2013 concerning the prevention and eradication of forest destruction which is punishable by a minimum imprisonment of 3 (three) years. Problem formulation: 1) How is the judge's consideration in Decision Number: 93/PID.B/LH/2023/PN PSB regarding release from all charges in environmental crimes? 2) What are the legal remedies against the judge's decision in the form of release from all legal charges in environmental crimes. This research uses a type of Normative Juridical legal research, legal data sources consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques are carried out by literature study by reviewing the decision of the West Pasaman District Court judge. Data analyzed with qualitative analysis. The results of the research are 1) The consideration of the judge in Decision Number: 93/PID.B/LH/2023/PN.PSB is that the panel of judges juridically and nonjuridically considers the defendant's actions which are not criminal acts but civil acts on the issue of agrarian conflicts between the community and government policies in unresolved national strategic projects 2) The legal effort against the judge's decision in the form of release from all charges in environmental crimes is that the public prosecutor filed an appeal on the grounds that the judex facti of the District Court in deciding the case did not apply the rule of law as it should.References
A. Buku-buku
Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin,
Pengantar Metode Penelitian
Hukum (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
Persada, 2006)
Lilik Mulyadi, Kompilasi Hukum
Pidana dalam Perspektif Teoristis
dan Praktek Peradilan (Bandung:
Mandar Maju, 2007)
Sanidjar Pebrihariati R, Hukum
Lingkungan (Padang: Bung Hatta
University Press, 2017)
Zainuddin Ali, Metode Penelitian
Hukum (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika,
.
B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik
Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946
Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum
Pidana
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia
Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum
Acara Pidana.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia
Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang
Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan
Hidup
C. Sumber Lain
Analiusman Laia, Akibat Hukum Terhadap
Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan
Hukum Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi,
Jurnal Panah Hukum 3, no. 1 (Juli 2024).
Anak Agung Gede Wiweka Narendra dkk,
“Pertimbangan Hukum Terhadap Putusan
Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum
(Ontslag Van Rechtsvervolging),Jurnal
Konstruksi Hukum 1, no. 2 (Oktober
Andre G. Mawe, “Pertimbangan Hakim
Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Lepas Dari
Segala Tuntutan Hukum,†Lex Crimen 5,
no. 2 (Februari 2016)
