ANALISIS PRAKTIK NEPOTISME DALAM PEMILIHAN UMUM PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 33/PUU-XIII/2015

Abstract

After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 33/PUU-XIII/2015 after the elimination of the provisions on the practice of nepotism prohibiting nepotism in elections by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 33/PUU-XIII/2015, there has been a lot of nepotism in elections. The formulation of the problem in this study is 1) How is the analysis of the practice of nepotism in the general election after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 33/PUU-XIII/2015. 2) How are the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court judges regarding nepotism in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 33/PUU-XIII/2015. Normative juridical legal research method. Normative research is research that reviews documents and uses various secondary data. Data is analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study are: 1) After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 33/PUU-XIII/2015, many cases of nepotism occurred, including the cases of Gibran Rakabuming Raka as Vice Presidential Candidate in 2024, Atut Chosiyah as Governor of Banten, Rizky Nata Kusumah as DPRD, and Epriyadi Asda as Regent of Solok Regency. 2) The legal considerations of the Constitutional Court Judge in Decision Number 33/PUU-XIII/2015 consist of, a restrictions have been regulated in the Law, b contains discriminatory content, c is difficult to implement because its meaning is left to each person, and d is contrary to the Law.