PENERAPAN FUNGSI ODONTOGRAM DALAM MENGIDENTIFIKASI KORBAN KEJAHATAN PADA TAHAP PENYELIDIKAN
Keywords:
forensic odontology, odontogram, victim identification, criminal investigationAbstract
Forensic odontology has an important role in supporting the criminal investigation process, especially in identifying victims found in conditions that make visual or fingerprint identification impossible, such as decomposition, burning, or mutilation. One of the main tools used is the odontogram, a dental record that contains the unique characteristics of a person's teeth. Based on Article 184 of the KUHAP and Article 13 of the Minister of Health Regulation No. 269 of 2008, the odontogram is legally recognized as part of expert testimony. Problem formulation: 1) What is the function of the odontogram in identifying crime victims in the criminal investigation process in Indonesia? 2) How is the odontogram used in identifying crime victims at the Kediri Police Department? Type of socio-legal-research. Data sources: primary data and secondary data. Data collection through questionnaires, document studies, and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Research results: 1) The odontogram is legally valid and scientifically reliable as an identification tool, especially for decomposed or burned bodies. In the Kediri Police Department, only 2.9% of investigators have used odontograms, with 97.1% still relying on fingerprints. 2) Obstacles include the lack of antemortem dental data, lack of forensic dental experts, and absence of supporting infrastructure. Efforts are needed to integrate dental data into national systems, strengthen regulations, provide training, and increase public awareness regarding the importance of dental records.References
A. Buku dan Literatur
Herawati, K. M., Rahayu, D. M., &
Pramudyo, B. (2022). Hukum
Kesehatan. Media Sains Indonesia.
Purwadianto, A., et al. (2023). Kode Etik
Rumah Sakit Indonesia.
Perhimpunan Rumah Sakit Seluruh
Indonesia.
Yofiza, M. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum
Terhadap Profesi Kedokteran. PT
Rajagrafindo Persada.
Widodo, W. (2011). Alternatif Penyelesaian
Sengketa Medik. CV Agung Seto.B. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar
Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun
Indonesia. (1981). Kitab Undang-Undang
Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Menteri
Kesehatan Nomor 269 Tahun 2008
tentang Rekam Medis.
Putusan Pengadilan Mahkamah Agung
Republik Indonesia. (2015). Putusan
Nomor 06 K/PID/2015.
C. Sumber Lain
Nasution, U. P. (2021). Efektivitas Mediasi
dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis
(Studi Lapangan Rumah Sakit PKU
Muhammadiyah Gamping Sleman).
Widya Pranata Hukum: Jurnal
Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum, 2(2),
–108.
Tadda, A., Indar, & Ilyas, A. (n.d.). Tinjauan
Eksistensi Komite Etik dan Hukum
Rumah Sakit (KEHRS) dalam
Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik. Jurnal
Ilmiah Ecosystem, Universitas
Hasanuddin.