PENERAPAN FUNGSI ODONTOGRAM DALAM MENGIDENTIFIKASI KORBAN KEJAHATAN PADA TAHAP PENYELIDIKAN

Authors

  • Istyana Prelesamudra Perdamaian Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bung Hatta

Keywords:

forensic odontology, odontogram, victim identification, criminal investigation

Abstract

Forensic odontology has an important role in supporting the criminal investigation process, especially in identifying victims found in conditions that make visual or fingerprint identification impossible, such as decomposition, burning, or mutilation. One of the main tools used is the odontogram, a dental record that contains the unique characteristics of a person's teeth. Based on Article 184 of the KUHAP and Article 13 of the Minister of Health Regulation No. 269 of 2008, the odontogram is legally recognized as part of expert testimony. Problem formulation: 1) What is the function of the odontogram in identifying crime victims in the criminal investigation process in Indonesia? 2) How is the odontogram used in identifying crime victims at the Kediri Police Department? Type of socio-legal-research. Data sources: primary data and secondary data. Data collection through questionnaires, document studies, and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Research results: 1) The odontogram is legally valid and scientifically reliable as an identification tool, especially for decomposed or burned bodies. In the Kediri Police Department, only 2.9% of investigators have used odontograms, with 97.1% still relying on fingerprints. 2) Obstacles include the lack of antemortem dental data, lack of forensic dental experts, and absence of supporting infrastructure. Efforts are needed to integrate dental data into national systems, strengthen regulations, provide training, and increase public awareness regarding the importance of dental records.

References

A. Buku dan Literatur

Herawati, K. M., Rahayu, D. M., &

Pramudyo, B. (2022). Hukum

Kesehatan. Media Sains Indonesia.

Purwadianto, A., et al. (2023). Kode Etik

Rumah Sakit Indonesia.

Perhimpunan Rumah Sakit Seluruh

Indonesia.

Yofiza, M. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum

Terhadap Profesi Kedokteran. PT

Rajagrafindo Persada.

Widodo, W. (2011). Alternatif Penyelesaian

Sengketa Medik. CV Agung Seto.B. Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar

Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun

Indonesia. (1981). Kitab Undang-Undang

Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Menteri

Kesehatan Nomor 269 Tahun 2008

tentang Rekam Medis.

Putusan Pengadilan Mahkamah Agung

Republik Indonesia. (2015). Putusan

Nomor 06 K/PID/2015.

C. Sumber Lain

Nasution, U. P. (2021). Efektivitas Mediasi

dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis

(Studi Lapangan Rumah Sakit PKU

Muhammadiyah Gamping Sleman).

Widya Pranata Hukum: Jurnal

Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum, 2(2),

–108.

Tadda, A., Indar, & Ilyas, A. (n.d.). Tinjauan

Eksistensi Komite Etik dan Hukum

Rumah Sakit (KEHRS) dalam

Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik. Jurnal

Ilmiah Ecosystem, Universitas

Hasanuddin.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-25