KAJIAN YURIDIS KONFLIK PERDAGANGAN INTERNASIONAL ANTARA AMERIKA SERIKAT DENGAN CHINA TERKAIT PRODUK ANTI SUBSIDI DITINJAUDARI PRINSIP MOST FAVOURED NATION

Authors

  • Anggy Rifany Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Deswita Rosra Universitas Bung Hatta

Keywords:

Keywords: Conflict, International Trade, MFN Principle

Abstract

The trade conflict between the United States and China has become one of the important dynamics in the international trade system, especially related to the implementation of anti-subsidy policies by the United States against products from China. The United States violates the provisions made by the WTO against Chinese products in which America violates one of the principles of international trade, namely Most Favored Nation (MFN), regulated in the General Agreement On Tariffs And Trade (GATT) 1994. The MFN principle demands that any trade benefits or facilities granted to one WTO member country must be applied equally to all other members, without discrimination. Problem formulation: 1. How are the provisions of international trade according to the Most Favored Nation principle?, 2. How is the trade conflict between the United States and China regarding anti-subsidy products reviewed from the Most Favored Nation (MFN) principle? The research method used is normative juridical with the data sources used are secondary data with document study data collection techniques and data analyzed qualitatively. The study results indicate that: 1. International trade regulations adhere to the Most Favored Nation (MFN) principle, a fundamental principle of international trade. The MFN principle is a principle of non-discrimination, which states that there should be no discrimination between countries in international trade. This principle is stipulated in Article I of the GATT 1994, which requires all countries to comply with existing agreements. 2. The conflict between the United States and China constitutes a violation of the MFN principle by the United States. Furthermore, the United States is concerned about the dominance of Chinese which threatens local products.

 

References

Buku-buku

Fajar ND, Ahmad Mukti Dan Yulianto, 2010, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Penelitian Hukum Empiris, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar

Peter Van Den Bossche,Daniar Natakusumah,Dan Josep Wira Koesnaidi, 2010, Pengantar Hukum WTO, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta,

Pengaturan Perdagangan Internasional

GATT/ WTO 1994

Sumber Lain

Adhi Pradana Barus, Suhaidi, Sutiarnoto, Jelly Leviza, 2022, Sengketa Penerapan Tarif Impor Dan Hambatan Dagang Antara Amerika Serikat Dengan China Dalam Prespektif Kerangka WTO, Volume 2 Nomor 1, Hlm 46-47 Diakses Tanggal 20 April 2025 Jam 22.25 https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v2i1.21

Mohammad Faizal, WTO: Perang Tarif, Perdagangan AS-CHINA Bisa Terpangkas 80 Persen,https://ekbis.sindonews.com/read/1553447/33/wto-perang-tarif-perdagangan-as-china-bisa-terpangkas-hingga-80-persen-1744265071/7 diakses tanggal 16 Juli 2025 jam 11.30 WIB

Rasheed Khalid, et.al, 1999, The World Trade Organization and Developing Countries, The Opec Fund For International Development, Austria, hlm. 1.

Revo M, Babak Baru Perang Dagang AS-China: Indonesia Untung Apa Buntung? https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20240515064935-128-538117/babak-baru-perang-dagang-as-china-indonesia-untung-apa-buntung di akses tanggal 30 Oktober 2024 jam 23.02 WIB

Suryanto, Suryanto, and Poni Sukaesih Kurniati. "Analisis Perdagangan Internasional Indonesia dan Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhinya." Intermestic: Journal of International Studies 7.1 (2022): 104-122. di akses tanggal 28 Oktober 2024 jam 22.50 WIB

Downloads

Published

2025-09-16