ANALIS YURIDIS PEMBUKTIAN TERHADAP ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PROSES PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA BERDASARKAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 140/G/TF/2020/PTUN.JKT)

Authors

  • Haykal Muthari Ramadhan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Boy YendraTamin Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bung Hatta

Keywords:

Electronic Evidence, Proof, State Administrative Court, PTUN Decision, Legal Analysis

Abstract

The development of information technology has brought significant changes in the legal
evidence system, especially in the State Administrative Court. Electronic evidence is now an
important part of the evidence process, but its application still faces various legal challenges
related to the validity and strength of evidence. The formulation of the research problem is 1)
What is the position of electronic evidence in the evidence in the State Administrative Court
legal system 2) How is the application of electronic evidence in resolving cases in the State
Administrative Court Decision Number 140 / G.TF / 2020 / PTUN.JKT concerning the
Obligation to Use Health Applications? In this study, a normative juridical research method
is used on legal principles and court decisions with secondary data sources consisting of
primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials with document study data collection
techniques that are analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study are 1) The position of
electronic evidence in the State Administrative court system is contained in Law No. 1 of
2024 and is strengthened by Perma No. 1 of 2019 which regulates the use of electronic
documents in trials to support the efficiency and accountability of the judicial process 2) The
application of electronic evidence in the PTUN Decision Number 140 / G / TF / 2020
concerning the Obligation to Use Health Applications, namely electronic evidence
emphasizes formal validity and material strength, with a focus on the integrity, authenticity,
and relevance of evidence.

References

A.Buku-buku

Djoemali Abdul, 2009, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.

Mukti Arto, 2014, Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang- Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

C. Sumber Lain

Indonesia. Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta. Putusan Nomor 140/G/TF/2020/PTUN.JKT. Johan Wahyudi, 2019, Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Pembuktian di Pengadilan, Jurnal Hukum Vol.XVII, Surabaya, Fakultas Hukum Universtias Airlangga.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-22