PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PIDANA DENDA DIGANTI DENGAN PIDANA KURUNGAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA ( STUDY DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KLAS 1A PADANG)

Abstract

ABSTRACT
In a court decision handed down in the trial court judge , the narcotic crime judges often impos a fine in lieu of imprisonment . If the convicted person is unable to pay the fine , it can be replaced with imprisonment . The following issues : 1 ) How does the consideration of judges in imposing criminal penalties to be replaced with a substitute imprisonment penalties ,2 ) How to determine the ratio between the amount of the fine with the length of confinement lieu of fines , 3 ) Is constraints encountered the judge in determining the amount of the fine calculation with the length of confinement replacement . Type used is the juridical sociological research . In this study the author uses primary data and secondary data . Primary data were obtained by conducting interviews , secondary data obtained from the study kepustakaan.Teknik data collection through interviews and document research . Were analyzed qualitatively . From this study it can be concluded : 1 ) consideration of the judge in a criminal verdict replaced fines to imprisonment , in addition based on the existing regulations on how the calculation of conscience and belief hakim.2 ) In determining the ratio between the amount of the fine with the length of confinement substitute judge fines sticking to the Criminal Code and Perma No. 2 of 2002 . 3 ) The constraints are met the judge in determining the length of confinement calculation lieu of fines as set forth in the book of the Law of Criminal Law ( Penal Code ) the nominal amount per day is too small and no longer in line with the value of money at The present time.
Keywords : Judge , Fines , sKurungan , Narcotics

DAFTAR PUSTAKA
A.Z, Abidin Farid dan A. Hamzah. 2008. Bentuk-bentuk Khusus Perwujudan Delik (Percobaan, Penyertaan, dan Gabungan Delik) dan Hukum Penitensier. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Adami Chazawi. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana I, Stelsel Pidan,, Tindak Pidana, Teori-Teori Pemidanaan & Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
8
.
Andi Hamza. 1993, Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita.
Barda Nawawi Arief. 2010. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana
Bambang Sunggono. 2003. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. 1992. Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
M, Yayah Harahap. 2007. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
S.R.Sianturi dan Mompang L. Panggabean.1996, Hukum Penitensia di Indonesia.Jakarta: Alumni Ahaem-Petehaem.
Sholehuddin. 2003.Sistem Sanksi Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Supramono, Gatot. 2007. Hukum Narkoba Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Tolib Setiady 2010 .Pokok-Pokok Hukum Penitensier Indonesia. Bandung: Alfabeta.