CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF A MIDWIFE IN THE PROCESS OF LABOR IN MALPRACTICE CASES (CASE STUDY CASE NO. 2 101 K / Pid.Sus / 2010)

Authors

  • M. Ikhsan Septian
  • Uning Pratimaratri
  • Syafridatati Syafridatati

Abstract

Responsibility is an important aspect of nursing ethics. Responsibility is the willingness of a person to prepare themselves to face even the worst risks, compensation or information to what is already done in carrying out the task. Issues raised in this paper are: (1) What is the nature of criminal liability in malpractice cases midwife in case No. 2101 K / Pid.Sus / 2010, (2) How is the consideration of the judge in the case of malpractice in case No. 2101 K / Pid. Sus / 2010 This study is a normative law, which is reviewing the Decision No. 2101K / Pid.Sus / 2010. Legal materials collected through the study of documents and analyzed qualitatively analyzed. From the research that has been done, it can be concluded: (1) that the defendant has the responsibility to run it properly by following a predefined path starting from the trial in the district court, high court and Supreme Court levels, and the Supreme Court ruled that states that defendant was not proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a crime as charged Attorney General Guidance in all of indictment by the Supreme Court because the defendant declared free of all the charges (2) consideration of judges in deciding this case based on the evidence of witnesses and expert witness testimony, and beliefs of judges.


Key Word: Liability, Midwife, Malpractice, Labor

References

Ari Yunanto, 2010, Hukum Pidana Malpraktek Medik, ANDY, Yogyakarta

Amirudin dan Zainal Asikin, 2004, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta

Bambang Sunggono, 2003, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo, Jakarta

Roeslan Saleh, 1981, Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana, Aksara Baru, Jakarta

Choirul Huda, 2008, Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan, Kencana, Jakarta

Syahrul Mahmud, 2008, Penegakan Hukum dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Dokter yang diduga Melakukan Medikal Malpraktek, Mandar Maju, Bandung Mulyatno, Jakarta, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta

M Sholehudin, 2004, Sitem Sanki dalam Hukum Pidana, Ide Dasar Double Track System dan Implementasinya, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Andi Hamzah, Kamus Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, 2005.

Soekidjo Notoatmojo, Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2010

Titik Triwulan dan Shinta Febrian, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pasien, Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta, 2010, hlm 48.

Munir Fuady, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pendekatan Kontemporer, Citra Adiyta Bakti, Bandung, 2010

Bander Johan Nasution, Hukum Kesehatan dan Pertanggungjawaban Dokter, Rineka Cipta, Surabaya, 2005

Wila Chandrawila Supriadi, Hukum Kedokteran, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2001

Downloads

Published

2014-08-27