STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE RECORDING PHONE TAPPING ON CORRUPTION

Abstract

Corruption is a criminal offense remarkable. Corruption is usually done in secret. To
overcome this, a letter of Article 12 of Law No. 30 of 2002 on the Corruption Eradication
Commission, the investigator is authorized to conduct wiretaps. This phone wiretaps used as
evidence. Formulation of the problem 1) How does the strength of evidence telephone
wiretaps on corruption, 2) What is the status telephone wiretaps on corruption. This study
uses normative juridical approach. Materials studied law is Supreme Court Decision No ;
1195/K/Pid-Sus/2014. The legal materials obtained through the study of documents. Legal
materials were analyzed qualitatively. Data Sources primary legal materials, secondary law.
In conclusion 1) Strength of evidence telephone wiretaps on corruption, the strength of
evidence recording has a clear strength of evidence and legal basis, including Section 26A of
Act Number 20 of 2001 on the Amendment of Act No. 31 of 1999 on the Eradication
Corruption. 2) Position Recording Phone Tapping On Corruption by the Supreme Court
Decision No. 1195/K/Pid-Sus/2014, that kind of evidence set out in the Criminal Code
extended by Act No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions so that the
wiretap recording evidence can be accepted as valid evidence appropriate procedural law
applicable in Indonesia.
Keywords: Evidence, Wiretapping, Telephone, Corruption.