PENERAPAN PIDANA MATI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KLAS IA PADANG (Putusan No. 273/Pid.B/2011.PN.PDG)
Abstract
The death penalty has become a punishment that can be applied to a crime that is very heavy and the culprit can’t be developed further. Padang District Court Judge for it has falling death penalty against the crime of murder. Issues to be discussed are: (1) Whether the consideration of judges in bringing the death penalty verdict against the crime of murder in the District Court of Class IA Padang? (2) How is the application of the death penalty against the convicted person who committed the crime of premeditated murder in the District Court of Class IA Padang?. Normative juridical research approach. Legal materials Decision No. 273/Pid.B/2011.PN.PDG . Data collection techniques is the study of documents and data were analyzed qualitatively. From the results of this study concluded: (1) Consideration of aggravating that acts defendant has violated Article 340 , 286 , 362 of the Criminal Code , the defendant had violated the criminal law Twenty Minangkabau, the defendant did not have compassion and mercy at all, mitigating ie not No excuses and no mitigating circumstances penalties a defendant (2) the application of the law in this case is murder, which is regulated in Article 340 of the Penal Code which carries a minimum sentence is the maximum death penalty, life imprisonment or imprisonment of 20 years so that from above the judge's decision can be seen that the judge to apply the maximum penalty for a defendant who proved to have committed the act that is to impose the death penalty.Keywords: Crime, death, murder, planning
References
Buku-buku
Adami Chazawi, 2002, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana, Bagian 2; Penafsiran Hukum Pidana, Dasar Peniadaan, Pemberatan & Peringanan, Kejahatan Aduan, Perbarengan & Ajaran Kausalitas, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Bambang Poernomo, 1982, Ancaman Pidana Mati dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
Djoko Prakoso, 1983, Studi Tentang Pendapat-Pendapat Mengenai Efektivitas Pidana Mati di Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Dwija Priyatno, 2006, Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia, Rafika Aditama, Bandung.
E. Utrecht, 2000, Hukum Pidana, Pustaka Tinta Mas, Surabaya.
Harun M. Husein, 2005, Surat Dakwaan Teknik Penyusunan, Fungsi, dan Permasalahannya, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Lilik Mulyadi, 2007, Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Moeliatno, 1993, Azas-azas Hukum Pidana,Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
M. Yahya Harahap, 2009, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Neng Sarmida, dkk, 2002, Diktat Hukum Pidana, Bagian Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas Padang.
P.A.F Lamintang, 1988, Hukum Penitensier Indonesia, Armico, Bandung.
Rusli Muhammad, 2007, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1986, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, UI Pres.
Perundang-undangan
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Sumber Lain
Edi Abdullah, Terpidana Pembunuhan Dieksekusi Mati, http://Hukum. Kompasina.com/2013/05/23/
Eliza, Ancaman Pidana Mati di Indonesia, http//www.google.com /2013/05/20/
Putusan Nomor.273/Pid.B/2011.PN.PDG Pengadilan Negeri Klas IA Padang
