PENERAPAN PIDANA PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DANA BANTUAN SOSIAL (Studi Perkara No.18/Pid.Sus/Tpk/2014/PN.Pdg)

Authors

  • Nia Rahma
  • Fitriati Fitriati
  • Yetisma Saini

Abstract

Corruption provisions stipulated in the Act. 20 year 2001 amendments to the Act. No. 31 year 1999 on Corruption Eradication Article 2 paragraph (1). Combating corruption has increased and become a whole nation's commitment to make it happen. The application of the criminal is one effort to eradicate corruption. Formulation of the problem is 1) How the application of the criminal law of corruption on social assistance (Case study 18/Pid.Sus/Tpk/2014/PN.Pdg) ? 2) How consideration the judge gives a decision against corruption social aid (Case study 18 /Pid.Sus/Tpk/2014/PN.Pdg)?. The method used is a normative juridical. Data source is the primary legal materials, secondary law materials and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques with or how to preparation of duty files documents relating to the object under study, then analyzed qualitatively operations. Conclusion from the results of research findings is 1) A criminal applied against corruption social assistance funds under the Act done No. 20 of 2001 Anti Corruption Act amendment No. 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Article 2 paragraph (1) Jo Article 18 paragraph (1) letter b , paragraph (2) and (3) Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code was decided law for 4 years imprisonment and a fine of 200 million. Considerations that juridical considerations shaping public prosecutor charges , testimony of the defendant, witness testimony, evidence, and the articles of the criminal law as a non judicial consideration in the form of a background of the defendant, the defendant himself conditions, socioeconomic circumstances, aggravating factors, ease things, facts and the conscience of the judge to bring the sentence.
Key words : Implementation, Crime, Corruption, Social Assistance

References

Buku-buku

Aziz Syamsuddin, 2010, Tindak Pidana Khusus, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Elwi Danil, 2011, Korupsi, Gajah Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Evi Hartanti, 2005, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Jan Remmelink, 2003, Hukum Pidana, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Leden Marpaung, 2005, Asas Teori Praktik Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Moeljatno, 1993, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, 2005, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung.

P.A.F. Lamintang, 1984, Hukum Penitensier Indonesia, Armico, Bandung.

Rusli Muhammad, 2006, Potret Lembaga Pengadilan Indonesia, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Sholehunddin, 2004, Sistem Sanksi Dalam Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2006, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Yusran Lapananda, 2013, Hibah Dan Bantuan Sosial Yang Bersumber Dari APBD, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Peraturan perundang-undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999yang tealah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 2012 perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 32 Tahun 2011 tentang Pedoman Pemberian Hibah dan Bantuan Sosial yang Bersumber dari Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah.

Sumber Lain

AndreasYoga,http://www.indonesiamedia.com/2011/02/02/banalisasi-korupsi/, diakses tanggal 15 September 2014.

Transparansi Internasional Indonesia, http://www.ti.or.id/read/indonesia-ranking-114-negara-terkorup-di-dunia, di akses tanggal 13 Oktober 2014.

Maryanto, 2012, Pemberantasan Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Penegakan hukum, Jurnal ilmiah CIVIS, Jakarta, di akses tanggal 16 Januari 2015.

Downloads

Published

2015-02-16