ANALISIS KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN JABATAN DALAM MENGGANDAKAN REKENING BANK (Studi Kasus: Putusan No. 1945/Pid.B/2005/PN.MDN)
Abstract
The development of banking criminal offense other than a lot of very adverse impact on the party in which the victims, will also lead to a negative impression of the people against the Indonesian banking institutions. Probms to be discussed are: (1) What are the factors that favor the occurrence of criminal fraud in the banking sector on Decision No. 1945 / Pid.B / 2005 / PN.MDN? (2) How is the consideration of the judge in imposing punishment to the perpetrators of the crime of fraud in the banking sector on Decision No. 1945 / Pid.B / 2005 / PN.MDN? (3) How is the application of the criminal to criminal fraud in the banking sector on Decision No. 1945 / Pid.B / 2005 / PN.MDN?. To answer the above problems, the authors conducted a study with normative juridical research method that examines the decision No. 1945 / Pid.B / 2005 / PN.MDN. Data collection techniques using literature. The data were analyzed qualitatively. From the results of this study concluded: (1) factors that contribute to criminal acts in the field of banking fraud that ethical principles of banking, legal relationship between the bank and the account holder, the number of types of accounts that led to the emergence of fictitious accounts in the form of duplicate accounts and law enforcement. (2) The consideration of the judge in matters against the defendant based on the consideration of judges, among others defendant disturbing the public, especially for customers of Bank Rakyat Indonesia Unit Bandung, the defendant has never been convicted, the defendant and the defendant's regret will perbuatanya still young and is expected to still be able to change his actions in the future. (3) The application of criminal penalties less perceived sense of fairness when considering the principle of absolute liability or stric liability on corporations to criminal fraud in the banking sector.Keywords: Embezzlement, position, reproduce, bank accounts
References
American Institute of banking, 1989, Dasar-Dasar Operasi Bank, Bina Aksara, Jakarta.
Barda Nawawi Arief, 1996, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.
John Simon, 2004, Bekerja di Bank itu Mudah, PT.Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, hlm. 5
Moeljanto, 1993, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Muladi, 1992, Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung.
M. Yahya Harahap, 2009, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
O.P.Simorangkir, 1978, Etik Dan Moral Perbankan, Akademi Ilmu Perbankan, Jakarta.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2010, Sumber-Sumber Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenanda
Media Group, Jakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1990, Ringkasan Metode Penelitian Hukum Empiris, Hiilco, Jakarta.
Sudarto, 1979, Suatu Dilemma Dalam Pembaharuan Sistem Pidana Di Indonesia, Fakultas Hukum,Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
, 1981, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Sinar Baru, Bandung.
Victor M.Situmorang, 1990, Tindak Pidana Pegawai Negeri Sipil, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 2003, Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu Di Indonesia, PT.Refika Aditama, Jakarta.
Zainuddin Ali, 2013, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
A. Peraturan Perundang-undangan:
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perbankan
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2004 Tentang Bank Indonesia
B. Sumber Lain:
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan dengan Nomor 1945/Pid.B/2005/PN.Mdn.
