THE IMPLICATIONS OF ASEAN WAY TOWARDS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN ASEAN

Authors

  • Muhammad Rizki
  • Poniar Warsono
  • Deswita Rosra

Abstract

International relations held between countries, either towards individually or among
countries within the same International Organization are not always well established. From
its inception and at the initial phase of its development, the main purpose of ASEAN was to
maintain peace and security among the member countries. To date, the settlement of disputes
in ASEAN still cause confusion regarding the regulations, mechanism and method of work.
This is primarily due to the ASEAN Way as an approach that emphasizes "at a pace
comfortable for all" for all ASEAN member countries, and is characterized by elements of
non-interference and consensus. At the early stage, disputes among ASEAN member States
are usually negotiated and formulated through the ASEAN Way. However, these disputes are
often difficult to resolve due to various constraints, in particular the existence of ambiguous
provisions which make the implementation of the provisions in the resolution of the dispute
become difficult. With this background, several problems that arise are as follows: How is the
formulation of the problem? How is the dispute settlement mechanism in ASEAN
implemented? What are the impacts of the ASEAN Way towards the dispute resolution
mechanism in ASEAN? What are the challenges and obstacles in resolving disputes in
ASEAN? This study uses a Sociological-Legal approach which is focused on the existing
cases combined with the use of secondary data sources and qualitative analysis. This study
showed that the primary instruments pertaining to dispute settlement mechanism in ASEAN
are the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC), Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM),
Enhanced Dispute Settlement Mechanism (EDSM), and ASEAN Way. The ASEAN Way has
an impact on both security and regional stability. However, the rule of law is usually absent
in the settlement of the dispute. Consequently, the dispute may reoccur or have an impact on
the same dispute later in the future. Challenges and barriers that often happen include the lack
of ratification of ASEAN member States towards the ASEAN instruments regarding dispute
settlement and also lack of trust towards fellow Member States.
Keywords : Implications, ASEAN Way, Mechanism, Dispute Settlement

References

A. Buku dan Laporan Ilmiah

A.K.,Syahmin, 1987, Masalah- Masalah

Aktual Hukum Organisasi Internasional,

Cetakan ke-1, CV. ARMICO, Bandung.

Abdul Kadir Jailani, “ASEAN

LAW”,2014, “Sosialisasi dan

Lokakarya ASEAN, Direktorat

Kerjasama ASEAN”, Padang.

_______________, “ASEAN DSM”.2014.

Boermauna, 2000, Hukum Internasional :

Pengertian, Peranan, dan Fungsi

Dalam Era Dinamika Global, Penerbit

Alumni, Jakarta.

Centre for International Law, 2013,

“ASEAN Intergration Through Law”,

Singapore.

_______________________, “Dispute

Settlement in ASEAN”, Singapore.

Damos Dumoli Agusman, 2010, Hukum

Perjanjian Internasional, PT. Refika

Aditama, Bandung.

Direktorat Jenderal Kerja Sama ASEAN,

, “Sosialisasi Komunitas ASEAN

dan Lokakarya Isu-Isu Hukum di

ASEAN untuk Dosen” , Padang.

________________________________,

ASEAN Selayang Pandang, Cetakan ke-

, Jakarta, Kementerian Luar Negeri

Republik Indonesia, 2012.

Huala Adolf , 2004, Hukum Penyelesaian

Sengketa Internasional, Sinar Grafika,

Jakarta.

Joseph Wira Koesnaidi dan Jerry

Shalmont, dkk., “FOR A MORE

EFFECTIVE AND COMPETITIVE

ASEAN DISPUTE SETTLEMENT

MECHANISM “ , Jakarta.

Kim Hyung Jong, 2007, “ASEAN WAY

AND ITS IMPLICATIONS AND

CHALLENGES FOR REGIONAL

INTEGRATION IN SOUTHEAST

ASIA”.

Martin Dixon et all, 2011, Cases and

Materials on International Law, Oxford

University Press, New York.

MochtarKusumaatmadja dan ER Agoes, ,

, Pengantar Hukum Internasional,

P.T. ALUMNI, Bandung.

Paul. J. Davidson, “ASEAN FEATURES :

THE ASEAN WAY AND THE ROLE OF

LAW IN ASEAN ECONOMIC

COOPERATION”,' 2004 Singapore

Year Book of International Law and

Contributors, Singapore.

Poniar Warsono, 2014, Penyelesaian

Sengketa Internasional, bahan ajar

Hukum Internasional, Fakultas Hukum

UNES, Padang.

Sugeng Istanto, 1994, Hukum

Internasional, Universitas Atma Jaya,

Yogyakarta.

Ukasah Martadisastra, 1984,

Perbandingan Administrasi Negara

ASEAN, CV. Remadja Karya, Bandung.

Wayan Parthiana, 1990, Pengantar Hukum

Internasional, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

B. Peraturan Perundang-undangan

ADDIS ABBABA 1963 CHARTER

ASEAN CHARTER

DSM (Dispute Settlement Mechanism)

EDSM (Enhanced Dispute Settlement

Mechanism)

ICJ STATUE

TAC 1967

TABLE OF ASEAN

TREATIES/AGREEMENTS AND

RATIFICATION As of March 2012

UNITED NATION CHARTER

C. Sumber- sumber lain

Abdul Kadir Jailani, “Penyelesaian

Sengketa ASEAN berdasarkan Treaty

of Amity Cooperation” , di akses dari

https://kadirjailani.wordpress.com/?blo

gsub=confirming#subscribe-blog.

Budiman, Aditya. 2011, ” Pemerintah RI

Fasilitasi Pertemuan Thailand-

Kamboja di Istana Bogor ”, TEMPO, 8

April 2011.

Eminent Person Group Report (EPG)

tahun 2005.

Juwita Art, “Pengertian Sengketa

Internasional”, diakses dari

http://juwitaart.

blogspot.com/2013/03/pengertiansengketa-

internasional.html

Kementerian Luar Negeri, “ASEAN Perlu

Review Protokol EDSM 2004 Guna

Perkuat Mekanisme Penyelesaian

Sengketa”, diakses dari

http://kemlu.go.id/Pages/News.aspx?ID

P=6565&l=id.

Khafid Documentary, “penyelesaian

sengketa di ASEAN sebelum dan

sesudah piagam asean 2007”, di akses

dari

http://khafidsociality.blogspot.com/201

/06/penyelesaian-sengketa-di-aseansebelum.

html.

Lem2lopez, “THE ‘ASEAN WAY’ AS

THE BEST DIPLOMATIC

APPROACH TO ASIA PACIFIC’S

CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES”,

diakses dari

http://thetalentedmrlem.wordpress.com/

/01/28/the-%E2%80%98aseanway%

E2%80%99-as-the-bestdiplomatic-

approach-to-asiapacific%

E2%80%99s-contemporarychallenges/.

Normin S.Pakpahan, Sistem Hukum di

Negara-Negara ASEAN, Bahan

Seminar dan Lokakarya Dosen Hukum

Se Sumatera, 2014, Mercure Hotel,

Padang.

Pkn19, “SUMBER HUKUM

INTERNASIONAL”, diakses dari

http://pkn19.blogspot.com/p/sumberhukum-

internasional.html.

Siti Fathanah Alwahdah, “The ASEAN

Ways” , diakses dari

http://chuliepetal.blogspot.com/2012/10

/the-asean-ways.html.

Walte Woon and David Marshall,

Desember 2012,” Dispute Settlement

The ASEAN WAY

“,http://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp/wpcontent/

uploads/2010/01/WalterWoon-

Dispute-Settlement-the-ASEAN-Way-

pdf.

Widyarinipritaningrum, “ Sengketa pulau

Sipadan dan Ligitan serta Resolusi

Konflik “, di akses dari

http://widyarinipritaningrum.blogspot.c

om/2014/03/sengketa-pulau-sipadandan-

ligitan.html.

Zainulafriansyah, “PROPOSAL

PENELITIAN HUKUM TINJAUAN

YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS

PENJAMINAN KREDIT USAHA

MIKRO, KECIL DAN MENENGAH

(UMKM) OLEH LEMBAGA

PENJAMIN KREDIT (Studi d”, di

akses dari

http://zainulafriansyah.blogspot.com/20

/06/proposal-penelitian-hukumtinjauan.

html

Downloads

Published

2015-02-18