THE IMPLICATIONS OF ASEAN WAY TOWARDS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN ASEAN
Abstract
International relations held between countries, either towards individually or amongcountries within the same International Organization are not always well established. From
its inception and at the initial phase of its development, the main purpose of ASEAN was to
maintain peace and security among the member countries. To date, the settlement of disputes
in ASEAN still cause confusion regarding the regulations, mechanism and method of work.
This is primarily due to the ASEAN Way as an approach that emphasizes "at a pace
comfortable for all" for all ASEAN member countries, and is characterized by elements of
non-interference and consensus. At the early stage, disputes among ASEAN member States
are usually negotiated and formulated through the ASEAN Way. However, these disputes are
often difficult to resolve due to various constraints, in particular the existence of ambiguous
provisions which make the implementation of the provisions in the resolution of the dispute
become difficult. With this background, several problems that arise are as follows: How is the
formulation of the problem? How is the dispute settlement mechanism in ASEAN
implemented? What are the impacts of the ASEAN Way towards the dispute resolution
mechanism in ASEAN? What are the challenges and obstacles in resolving disputes in
ASEAN? This study uses a Sociological-Legal approach which is focused on the existing
cases combined with the use of secondary data sources and qualitative analysis. This study
showed that the primary instruments pertaining to dispute settlement mechanism in ASEAN
are the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC), Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM),
Enhanced Dispute Settlement Mechanism (EDSM), and ASEAN Way. The ASEAN Way has
an impact on both security and regional stability. However, the rule of law is usually absent
in the settlement of the dispute. Consequently, the dispute may reoccur or have an impact on
the same dispute later in the future. Challenges and barriers that often happen include the lack
of ratification of ASEAN member States towards the ASEAN instruments regarding dispute
settlement and also lack of trust towards fellow Member States.
Keywords : Implications, ASEAN Way, Mechanism, Dispute Settlement
References
A. Buku dan Laporan Ilmiah
A.K.,Syahmin, 1987, Masalah- Masalah
Aktual Hukum Organisasi Internasional,
Cetakan ke-1, CV. ARMICO, Bandung.
Abdul Kadir Jailani, “ASEAN
LAW”,2014, “Sosialisasi dan
Lokakarya ASEAN, Direktorat
Kerjasama ASEAN”, Padang.
_______________, “ASEAN DSM”.2014.
Boermauna, 2000, Hukum Internasional :
Pengertian, Peranan, dan Fungsi
Dalam Era Dinamika Global, Penerbit
Alumni, Jakarta.
Centre for International Law, 2013,
“ASEAN Intergration Through Law”,
Singapore.
_______________________, “Dispute
Settlement in ASEAN”, Singapore.
Damos Dumoli Agusman, 2010, Hukum
Perjanjian Internasional, PT. Refika
Aditama, Bandung.
Direktorat Jenderal Kerja Sama ASEAN,
, “Sosialisasi Komunitas ASEAN
dan Lokakarya Isu-Isu Hukum di
ASEAN untuk Dosen” , Padang.
________________________________,
ASEAN Selayang Pandang, Cetakan ke-
, Jakarta, Kementerian Luar Negeri
Republik Indonesia, 2012.
Huala Adolf , 2004, Hukum Penyelesaian
Sengketa Internasional, Sinar Grafika,
Jakarta.
Joseph Wira Koesnaidi dan Jerry
Shalmont, dkk., “FOR A MORE
EFFECTIVE AND COMPETITIVE
ASEAN DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
MECHANISM “ , Jakarta.
Kim Hyung Jong, 2007, “ASEAN WAY
AND ITS IMPLICATIONS AND
CHALLENGES FOR REGIONAL
INTEGRATION IN SOUTHEAST
ASIA”.
Martin Dixon et all, 2011, Cases and
Materials on International Law, Oxford
University Press, New York.
MochtarKusumaatmadja dan ER Agoes, ,
, Pengantar Hukum Internasional,
P.T. ALUMNI, Bandung.
Paul. J. Davidson, “ASEAN FEATURES :
THE ASEAN WAY AND THE ROLE OF
LAW IN ASEAN ECONOMIC
COOPERATION”,' 2004 Singapore
Year Book of International Law and
Contributors, Singapore.
Poniar Warsono, 2014, Penyelesaian
Sengketa Internasional, bahan ajar
Hukum Internasional, Fakultas Hukum
UNES, Padang.
Sugeng Istanto, 1994, Hukum
Internasional, Universitas Atma Jaya,
Yogyakarta.
Ukasah Martadisastra, 1984,
Perbandingan Administrasi Negara
ASEAN, CV. Remadja Karya, Bandung.
Wayan Parthiana, 1990, Pengantar Hukum
Internasional, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
B. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
ADDIS ABBABA 1963 CHARTER
ASEAN CHARTER
DSM (Dispute Settlement Mechanism)
EDSM (Enhanced Dispute Settlement
Mechanism)
ICJ STATUE
TAC 1967
TABLE OF ASEAN
TREATIES/AGREEMENTS AND
RATIFICATION As of March 2012
UNITED NATION CHARTER
C. Sumber- sumber lain
Abdul Kadir Jailani, “Penyelesaian
Sengketa ASEAN berdasarkan Treaty
of Amity Cooperation” , di akses dari
https://kadirjailani.wordpress.com/?blo
gsub=confirming#subscribe-blog.
Budiman, Aditya. 2011, ” Pemerintah RI
Fasilitasi Pertemuan Thailand-
Kamboja di Istana Bogor ”, TEMPO, 8
April 2011.
Eminent Person Group Report (EPG)
tahun 2005.
Juwita Art, “Pengertian Sengketa
Internasional”, diakses dari
http://juwitaart.
blogspot.com/2013/03/pengertiansengketa-
internasional.html
Kementerian Luar Negeri, “ASEAN Perlu
Review Protokol EDSM 2004 Guna
Perkuat Mekanisme Penyelesaian
Sengketa”, diakses dari
http://kemlu.go.id/Pages/News.aspx?ID
P=6565&l=id.
Khafid Documentary, “penyelesaian
sengketa di ASEAN sebelum dan
sesudah piagam asean 2007”, di akses
dari
http://khafidsociality.blogspot.com/201
/06/penyelesaian-sengketa-di-aseansebelum.
html.
Lem2lopez, “THE ‘ASEAN WAY’ AS
THE BEST DIPLOMATIC
APPROACH TO ASIA PACIFIC’S
CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES”,
diakses dari
http://thetalentedmrlem.wordpress.com/
/01/28/the-%E2%80%98aseanway%
E2%80%99-as-the-bestdiplomatic-
approach-to-asiapacific%
E2%80%99s-contemporarychallenges/.
Normin S.Pakpahan, Sistem Hukum di
Negara-Negara ASEAN, Bahan
Seminar dan Lokakarya Dosen Hukum
Se Sumatera, 2014, Mercure Hotel,
Padang.
Pkn19, “SUMBER HUKUM
INTERNASIONAL”, diakses dari
http://pkn19.blogspot.com/p/sumberhukum-
internasional.html.
Siti Fathanah Alwahdah, “The ASEAN
Ways” , diakses dari
http://chuliepetal.blogspot.com/2012/10
/the-asean-ways.html.
Walte Woon and David Marshall,
Desember 2012,” Dispute Settlement
The ASEAN WAY
“,http://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp/wpcontent/
uploads/2010/01/WalterWoon-
Dispute-Settlement-the-ASEAN-Way-
pdf.
Widyarinipritaningrum, “ Sengketa pulau
Sipadan dan Ligitan serta Resolusi
Konflik “, di akses dari
http://widyarinipritaningrum.blogspot.c
om/2014/03/sengketa-pulau-sipadandan-
ligitan.html.
Zainulafriansyah, “PROPOSAL
PENELITIAN HUKUM TINJAUAN
YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS
PENJAMINAN KREDIT USAHA
MIKRO, KECIL DAN MENENGAH
(UMKM) OLEH LEMBAGA
PENJAMIN KREDIT (Studi d”, di
akses dari
http://zainulafriansyah.blogspot.com/20
/06/proposal-penelitian-hukumtinjauan.
html