PELAKSANAAN PENYITAAN BARANG BUKTI OLEH JAKSA TERHADAP KEKAYAAN TERSANGKA PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi Kejaksaan Negeri Padang)
Abstract
Corruption is a criminal act that causes harm to the state. Not only the loss of state but also hamper national development, it is necessary to confiscation of the wealth of suspected proceeds of corruption. The goal is to secure a confiscation order not to be moved so that a deterrent effect against perpetrators of corruption, as provided for in Article 39 of the Criminal Procedure Code of foreclosure. Formulation of the problem 1) How is the implementation of the seizure of evidence by the prosecution against the suspect richness corruption cases in Padang? 2) What are the barriers faced by prosecutors in the execution of confiscation of the wealth of evidence against suspected corruption cases in Padang? The approach used is the socio legal approach. Sources of data are primary data and secondary data. Data were collected by interview and documentary study. Data were analyzed qualitatively. Conclusions of the study are: 1) The seizure of evidence of the wealth of suspected cases of corruption committed by the State Attorney Padang is in conformity with the provisions contained in the Criminal Procedure Code and the storage of evidence is the responsibility of the State Attorney Padang 2) Barriers experienced prosecutors in the execution of confiscation the wealth of evidence against suspects is property assets of suspects have been camouflaged, where wealth has been in the form of cash or a bank account, limited human resources and budget constraints.Keywords: Foreclosure, Evidence, the Prosecutor, CorruptionReferences
A. Buku-Buku
Abdul Kadir Muhammad, 2004, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, Citra Aditya Bakti.
Andi Hamzah, 1986, Pengusutan Perkara Melalui Sarana Teknik dan Sarana Hukum, Jakarta , Ghalia Indonesia.
, Pelasanaan Peradilan Pidana berdasar Teori dan Praktek, Jakarta, Rineka CiptaAnsori Sabuan, 1990, Hukum Acara Pidana, Bandung, Angkasa.
Bambang Sunggono, 2007, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada.
Depdikbud RI, 1992, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia,Jakarta, Balai Pustaka.
Evi Hartanti, 2009, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Hermien HK, 1994, Korupsi di Indonesia dari Deik Jabatan ke Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bhakti.
Kartini Kartono, 2003, Patologi Sosial, Jakarta, Rajawali Press.
Krisna Harahap, 2006, Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia Jalan Tiada Ujung, Grafiti, Bandung.
M. Yahya Harahap, 2005, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP , Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Ratna Nurul Afiah, 1988, Barang Bukti Dalam Proses Pidana, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Rianto Adi, 2006, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika
Rusli Muhammad, 2007, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1986, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, UI-Press.
Soesoli Yuwono, 1982, Penyelesain Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan KUHAP Sistem dan Prosedur, Bandung, Alumni.
B. Perundang-undangan
Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
C. Sumber Lain
Andy Hermansyah, 2010, Sistem Pebuktian dan Teori Pembuktian,http://bloghukumumum.blogspot.co.id/2010/04/sistem-pembuktian-dan-teori-pembuktian.html, Diakses pada tanggal 15Oktober 2015, Pukul 17.52 WIB.
Agus Putu Agung, 2013, Dunia Hukum, http://indohukum.blogspot.co.id/2011/04/dasar-hukum-pembuktian.html, Diakses pada tanggal 15 Oktober 2015, Pukul 17.33 WIB.
Tempo Nasional,Eks Sekda Padang Ditahan Karena Kasus Korupsi,http://nasional.tempo.co/read/news/2014/11/05/058619853/eks-sekda-padang-ditahan-karena-kasus-korupsi, Di akses pada tanggal 5 Oktober 2015, Pukul 20.00 WIB.
