PENEGAKAN HUKUM LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT DI BATAM
Abstract
Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) was formed to oversee the implementation of Law No. 5 of 1999. In this case the Commission acts as a quasi-judicial agency. Issues to be addressed are: (1) How does the Commission Role in Law Enforcement Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition In Batam? (2) Are Obstacles and Law Enforcement Efforts In the Commission's Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition In Batam? The author conducted research with socio-juridical research method used interviews of primary data, secondary data relating to the Commission's documents Batam. Data were analyzed qualitatively. Concluded: (1) The role of the Commission, ie Preparing implementing regulations, Implementing regulations made, Dropping sanctions against businesses that violate and provide advice concerning Government policies (2) Constraints and efforts Batam, namely in terms of the execution of the Commission's decision. The Commission can not carry out the execution of the decision that has been made because it is necessary to carry out the execution of court fiat execution and in terms of authority, although the Commission has the authority to conduct the examination, but the results of the Commission investigation only be sufficient preliminary evidence for investigators. Forms of prevention efforts undertaken by the Commission Batam to avoid the occurrence of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition is Doing socialization at universities, provide advice to local authorities and provide appeal to businesses.
Keywords: Role, KPPU, Monopoly, Batam
References
A. Buku-buku
Agus Maulana, 2000, Pengantar Mikro Ekonomi, Jilid II, Jakarta, Bina Rupa Aksara.
Ahman Rohmana, 2007, Ilmu Ekonomi Dalam PIPS, Edisi Kedua, Cetakan Pertama, Penerbit Universitas Terbuka, Jakarta.
Bambang Sunggono, 2013, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.
Burhan Ashofa, 2010, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Darajat Zakiah, 1993, Perbandingan Pasar monopoli dan non monopoli, Jakarta:Bulan Bintang.
Firoz Gaffer & Ifdhal Kasim (Penyunting), Reformasi Hukum Di Indonesia: Hasil Studi Perkembangan Hukum – Proyek Bank Dunia, Penerjemah Niar Reksodiputro & Iman Pambagyo, Judul Asli: Diagnostic Assesment of Legal Development in Indonesia.CYBERconsult, cet kelima 2002.
Leonardus Saiman. Kewirausahaan Teori, Praktek, dan Kasus-kasus. 2009, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Kartini Kartono, 1996, Pengantar Metode dan Riset Sosial, Manjar Maju, Bandung.
Soejono Soekanto, 1984, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI-Press, Jakarta.
Zainuddin Ali, 2013, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
B. PeraturanPerundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat
Keputusan Presiden No. 75 Tahun 1999 tentang Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha
C.Sumber Lain
Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Mei - Juni 2002, Volume 19, Jakarta, Yayasan Pengembangan Hukum Bisnis.
http://avnasution.blogspot.com/2011/05/kegiatan-dan-perjanjian-yang-dilarang.html, makalah antimonopoly dan persaingan curang, diakses pada tanggal 28 Agustus 2015 pukul 09.54 WIB.
