PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU YANG MENYEDIAKAN SARANA DAN PRASARANA PERJUDIAN (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor: 226/Pid.B/2015/PN-PDG)
Abstract
Every human being always want the ease of getting something great value with very little effort and without hard work. Ways in which to get an ease that sometimes leads to a criminal offense. One of them is to provide facilities and infrastructure gambling games in the community. Everyone who does that the offender should be sentenced to punishment in accordance with Article 303 paragraph (1) and (2) of the Criminal Code as the case contained in the decision on case number 226 / Pid.B / 2015 / PN.Pdg. Formulation of the problem: (1) How Application of Criminal Dropped By Judge Against Perpetrators who Providing Infrastructures Gambling (Case Study No. 226 / Pid. B / 2015 / PN.Pdg) ?. (2) Do petimbangan judges in sentencing for perpetrators who provide Infrastructures Gambling (Case Study No. 226 / Pid. B / 2015 / PN.Pdg) ?. The approach used in this study is a normative approach. Secondary data sources include primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary. Data collection techniques are used literature. Data were analyzed qualitatively. Conclusions of the study: (1) Application of the given criminal prosecution to the accused that during the 6 months imprisonment in contrast to Article 303 paragraph (1) number 2 of the Criminal Code is 10 years imprisonment. (2) Consideration of the judge in imposing a sentence that is based on juridical considerations and the judge's conviction that background defendant and condition of self-inflicted criminal punishment to the defendant but the defendant still light that is six (6) months imprisonment.
Keywords: Criminal Application, Infrastructure, Facilities, Gambling
References
A. Buku-buku
Andi Hamzah, 2008, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Edisi Kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Bambang Sunggono, 2007, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Burhan Ashshofa, 1996, Metode Penelitian Hukum, cetakan pertama,pt.rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
J.E jonkers, 1987.Buku Pedoman Hukum Pidana Hindia Belanda, Bima Aksara, Jakarta.
Jhonny Ibrahim, 2007, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang
Kamus Besar Indonesia, 2007, Edisi Ketiga Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Balai Pustaka.
Kartini Kartono, 1981.Patologi Sosial, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Leden Marpaung, 1996, Unsur-Unsur Perbuatan Yang Dapat Dihukum (Delik), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
M. Nasir, 2005, Metode Penelitian, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Oemar Seno Adji, 1976, Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Prospektif, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Rusli Muhammad, 2006, Potret Lembaga Pengadilan Negeri, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
Sholehuddin,2002.Sistem Sanksi Dalam Hukum Pidana,Grafindo Raja Persada, Jakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto, 2011,Pengantar Penelitian Hukum,Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Sudarto, 1973, Hukum Pidana Jilid IA, Badan Penyidikan FK-UNDIP, Semarang.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 1974, Bunga Rampai Hukum, Sumur, Bandung.
Zainuddin Ali, 2013, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1974 Tentang Penertiban Perjudian
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman Negara Republik Indonesia.
C. Sumber Lain
Nano Oktaviano, 2013, Pengertian Perjudian dan Jenis Perjudian, http://www Pengertian judi-bookie. Html.
Ray Pratama, 2014, Berjudi divonis di hardiknas,http://www Ranah berita.com, Portal Posmetro Padang. Html.
Uswatun Khasanah, 2015, Pengertian Sanksi Pidana Menurut Ahli, http://www Media Pusat. Com Html.
