PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PRAPERADILAN PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 04/PID.PRAP/2015/PN.JKT.SEL
Abstract
Pretrial court is authorized of District Court to examine and decide on the lawfulness of the arrest or detention, the lawfulness of the termination of an investigation or prosecution, as well as the demand for compensation or rehabilitation for cases that are brought to trial. This Pretrial authority contained in Article 1 figures 10 in conjunction with Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The issuance of pretrial number 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. the applicant party Budi Gunawan against the Respondent the Corruption Eradication Commission, there are legal issues that arise that application submitted by the applicant is not the validity of the determination of the suspect by the defendant. The problems are concerned in are 1) How is judge’s pretrial considerations on the issuance of pretrial of issuance number 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel.? 2) How is implementation issuance of pretrial of issuance number 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. toward Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code?. Type of the research is normative juridical. They study used secondary data. The data got from documents study. The data were analyzed qualitatively. Research findings showed that : 1) Judge’s pretrial considerations on the issuance of pretrial number 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. is the basis of legal used by the judge is Article 1 figures 10 in conjunction Article 77 in conjunction Article 82 paragraph (1) in conjunction Article 95 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judge assess the validity of the establishment of the suspects are authority institutions pretrial 2) The implementation issuance of pretrial of issuance number 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. toward Article 77 of the expansion of the Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code that is associated with the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014 regarding the addition determination of the suspect as an object Pretrial.
Keywords : Considerations, The Judge, Pretrial, The issuance
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
A. Buku
Ahmad Rifai, 2010, Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, 2010, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Andi Hamzah, 2010, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta..
Darwan Prints, 1983, Praperadilan dan Perkembangan di dalam Praktek, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Lilik Mulyadi, 2007, Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Loebby Loqman, 1990, Praperadilan di Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
M. Yahya Harahap, 2000, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1990, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
B. PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman Negara Republik Indonesia.
C. SUMBER LAIN
Detik, Catat! Ini 2 Vonis Kontroversial PN Jaksel di Kasus Praperadilan, http://news.detik.com/berita/2818530/catat-ini-2-vonis-kontroversial-pn-jaksel-di-kasus-praperadilan
