PELAKSANAAN PENYITAAN BARANG BUKTI KEKAYAAN TERSANGKA DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (STUDI KEJAKSAAN NEGRI PADANG)
Abstract
Corruption into extraordinary crime and serious that the handling of these crimes were done specifically. Under the draft Criminal Code Article 38-46, confiscation of assets of suspected corruption by the Prosecutor. Law No. 31 of 1999 which was amended by Act No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication that the prosecution authorities investigating corruption cases, especially foreclosures. Confiscation of assets of suspects conducted by the prosecutor that the case of irregularities and misappropriation of government funds the purchase of official vehicles Padang. Problems are : (1) How is the implementation of the seizure of evidence by the prosecution against the suspect in a corruption case wealth in Padang District Attorney ?. (2) Are the constraints faced by the State Attorney Padang in the execution of the confiscation of evidence against a suspect in a corruption case wealth ? This study used socio-legal approach. Data sources include primary data and sekunder. Data were collected through interviews and documentary study. Data were analyzed qualitatively. Results: (1) The confiscation of property assets perpetrators of corruption by conducting warrant Seizure, securing the goods concerned and their witnesses, the minutes of seizure, and the approval of the court (2) Constraints do wealth of corruption that is evidence in the form of money saved in the bank, the evidence has been transferred to others and hard to determine the value of an object or treasure
Keywords: Foreclosure, Attorney, Wealth, Corruption
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
A. Buku-buku
Adami Chazawi, 2007, Kemahiran dan Keterampilan Praktik Hukum Pidana, Cet ke-2,Bayumedia Publishing, Malang.
Bambang Sunggono,2013, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.
Evi Hartanti, 2005, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Hari Sasangka dan Lily Rosita, 2003, Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana: Untuk Mahasiswa Dan Praktisi,Penerbit Mandar Maju, Bandung.
HMA Kuffal, 2007, Penerapan KUHAP Dalam Praktek Hukum, Cet. 9, UMM Press, Malang.
Kartini Kartono, 1996, Pengantar Metode dan Riset Sosial, Manjar Maju, Bandung.
M. Yahya Harahap, 2003, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, Cetakan kedelapan.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1983, Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakkan Hukum, Rajawali, Jakarta.
Soewartojo Junaidi, Korupsi Pola Kegiatan dan Penindakan Serta Peran Pengawasan Dalam Penanggulangannya, Restu Agung, Jakarta.
Zainuddin Ali, 2013, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
B. PeraturanPerundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang perubahan UU No. 31 Tahun 1999, tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia
C. Sumber Lain
Salahudin Luthfie, 2011, Kewenangan Kejaksaan Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Tesis Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
http://www.Selasar.Com/Politik/Kajari-Padang-Kasus-Rsud-Tuntas-Tahun-2015, Diakses Tenggal 17 Februari 2016
