ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENYADAPAN ALAT KOMUNIKASI ELEKTRONIK (Perbandingan Hukum Indonesia dengan Amerika Serikat

Mal Apriyanto Mal Apriyanto

Abstract


Abstract

 

Interception in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 19 Year 2016 regarding the amendment of Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions particular Article 31 and Article 40 of Law No. 39 of 1999 on Telecommunications and the United States set in electronic Communication privacy act. The problems raised in this research are: (1) How is the comparison of law about the crime of tapping of electronic communication device in Indonesia with United States (2) How is the legitimate interception procedure in Indonesian criminal law with United States. This study used the doctrinal approach, by reviewing Law No. 19 of 2016 on the amendment to Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions and Electronic Communication Privacy Act. Legal material was collected by document study, and then analyzed qualitatively. Conclusions: 1. the interception rules of Indonesia as well as in the United States have similarities in protecting personal information using communication tools. 2. Legal Interception procedures in Indonesia do not need permission to wiretap while in the United States must require court permission to wiretap.

Keywords:  comparison of law, interception, criminal acts, electronic communication tool


References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Adami Chazawi, 2002. Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, teori-teori Pemidanaan & Batas Berlakunya kum Pidana, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.

Amirudin & Zainal Asikin. 2004 Pengantar Metode Hukum.Rajawalipers. Jakarta.

Budi Suhariyanto,2013, Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (cybercrime), PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.

E.Y Kanter & S.R. Sianturi, 2012. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Storia Grafika, Jakarta.

Kristian & Yopi Gunawan.2013. Sekelumit Tentang Penyadapan Dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Penerbit nuansa aulia.Bandung.

Moeljatno, 2009. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta

O.C. Kaligis, 2012. Penerapan Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Dalam Prakteknya, Yarsif Watampone, Jakarta.

P.A.F Lamintang, 1997. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Cetakan ketiga. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Teguh Prasetio. 2012. Hukum Pidana. Radjagrafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto, 2010, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum,Ui-Pers, Jakarta.

¬¬__________& Sri Mamudji,2006, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat,Raja Grafindo Perseda, Jakarta.

Sudarto, 1990/1991. Hukum Pidana 1 A - 1B. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto.

Tanti Yuniar, 2009. Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia, Agung Media Mulia.

Undang-undang No 1 tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana ( KUHP )

Undang-undang Nomor 36 tahun 1999 tentang Telekomunikasi

Undang-undang Nomor 19 tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik

Electronic Communications Privacy Act 1986

Hwian Christianto, Tindakan Penyadapan Dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana,http://repositori.ubaya.ac.id/28472/1/tindakan-penyadapan-dari-perspektif hukumpidana.html.

Engkos Kosasih, definisi dan pengertian informasi,

http://www.definisi pengertian.com/2015/03/definisi-dan-pengertian-informasi.html.

Sudiman Sidabukke, Tinjauan Kewenangan Penyadapan Oleh Kpk Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia,

http://repository.ubaya.ac.id/133/1/Makalah%20Penyadapan%20KPK.pdf.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.