Analisis Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Padang Dalam Memutus Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Terkait Surat Keputusan Pemberhentian Aparatur Sipil Negara yang Melakukan Kejahatan Dalam Jabatan (Studi Putusan Nomor:24/G/2019/PTUN-PDG)

Abstract

Article 1 Number 14 Law Number 5 Year 2014 Concerning State Civil Servants in conjunction with Article 1 Number 17 Government Regulation Number 11 Year 2017 concerning Management of Civil Servants, in essence regulates that what is meant by Civil Service Officer (PPK), is an official who has the authority to determine the appointment, transfer, and dismissal of State Civil Service Employees and fostering the management of State Civil Apparatus in Government agencies in accordance with the provisions. Formulation of the problem (1) What are the legal considerations of judges in deciding State Administrative Disputes Number: 24 / G / 2019 / PTUN-PDG? (2) What are the legal implications of Decision Number: 24 / G / 2019 / PTUN-PDG on the Decree of Dismissing Apparatus State civilian who committed crimes in office ?. The research approach used is juridical normative, data collection techniques are through document study, data analysis in the form of qualitative analysis. Conclusion of research results (1) Judges' legal considerations, the Panel of Judges considers that based on the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (PERMA) Number 6 of 2018 concerning Guidelines for Government Administration Dispute Resolution After taking Administrative Efforts (2) Legal implications of Decision Number: 24 / G / 2019 / PTUN-PDG The plaintiff was dismissed with respect and was legally valid according to permanent law. Plaintiffs are deprived of their rights as Civil Servants to get health insurance, old age / pension benefits, and youth goals. (III / a) in the Work Unit of the Public Works Office of Fifty Cities Regency. Keywords: PTUN, ASN, Crime, Position