PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCULIKAN (Studi Perkara Nomor 650/Pid.B/2014/PN Pdg)
Abstract
Abduction of minors under Article 332 Penal Code. In Padang Negari Court cases of child abduction was 18 years old with Case No. 650 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN PDG. Issues to be addressed are: (1) How is the consideration of judges in decisions in criminal activities in the abduction case number 650 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN PDG? (2) How the juridical analysis of the application of material criminal law against the crime of kidnapping? This study uses normative juridical approach, this study examines the Decision No. 650 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN PDG. Material collected by engineering studies legal documents. Data were analyzed qualitatively. Conclusion: (1) Consideration of Judges which refers to Article 184 Criminal Procedure Code coupled with the confidence of judges based on the fulfillment of the elements of the article which the accused and the things that burden and relieve the defendant be imposed a penalty (2) Analysis of the Juridical Against the Application of Criminal Law material Against crime kidnapping is the fulfillment of indictment article 332 (1) ke- criminal Code and article 1 - another chapter of the rules in question thus declare the defendant legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing the crime of abduction.
 Keywords: Consideration Judge, Decision, Abduction
Â
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
A. Buku-buku
Adami Chazawi, 2002, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana, Bagian 1; Stelsel Pidana, Teori-Teori Pemidanaan & Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.
Andi Hamzah, 1994, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Artidjo Alkostar, 2009, Dimensi Kebenaran dalam Putusan Pengadilan,Varia Peradilan, Majalah Hukum Tahun XXIV Nomor. 281, Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI), Jakarta.
Bambang Sunggono,2013, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.
Bambang Sutiyoso dan Sri Hastuti Puspitasari, 2005, Aspek-Aspek Perkembangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia, UII Press, Yogyakarta, hlm.51.
Bawengan, G.W. 1991, Hukum Pidana dalam Teori dan Praktek, Pradnya Paramitha, Jakarta.
Burhan Ashofa, 2010, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Kartini Kartono, 1996, Pengantar Metode dan Riset Sosial, Manjar Maju, Bandung.
Lilik Mulyadi, 2010, Seraut Wajah: Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Citra Aditya, Jakarta.
Moeljatno, 1985, Membangun Hukum Pidana, Bina Aksara, Jakarta.
, 1993, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Purnadi Purbacaraka dan A. Ridwan Halim, 1982, Filsafat Hukum Pidana dalam Tanya Jawab, Jakarta: C.V Rajawali.
Romli Atmasasmita, 1984, Bunga Rampai Kriminologi, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Roeslan Saleh, 1978, Stelsel Pidana Indonesia, Aksara Baru, Jakarta.
Soesilo, R, 1995, Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), Politea: Jakarta.
Sudarto, 1988, Hukum Pidana I, Fakultas Hukum Undip, Semarang.
, 1981, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung.
Wirdjono Prodjodikoro, 2003, AsasAsas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Eresco, Bandung.
Zainuddin Ali, 2013, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
B. PeraturanPerundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
