PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN YANG BERKEKUATAN HUKUM TETAP OLEH JAKSA TERHADAP TERPIDANA PEMALSUAN SURAT (STUDI KASUS DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI PADANG)
Abstract
Execution of justice decision having legal force remain to according to Section 270 Law of No. 8 Year 1981 about Procedure of criminal mention execution of justice decision having legal force remain to be executed by attorney as eksekutor which is is previous to be accepted by justice decision copy of pertinent clerk of the court later;then attorney make letter execution of justice decision and sent by society kelembaga. So also to be punished by forgery of letter. Formula of Problem of that is 1) How execution of justice decision having legal force remain to by attorney to be punished by forgery of letter 2) Do constraints met by Attorney in executing justice decision having legal force remain to by attorney to be punished by forgery of letter. Research method the used is data sosiologis,sumber yuridis in obtaining from primary data and of sekunder, data collecting technique by document study and interview, used data analysis that is analysis of kualitif. Result of research is 1) execution of justice decision which with power of law remain to be punished by forgery of letter executed by attorney by accepting justice decision and attorney release warrant execution of decision 2) Constraint that happened is when punished which is dropped by decision, but in course of conference do not be arrested, might possibly turn tail at the (time) of to execute although have been known by address and identity punished, this because of punished to like to shift about to remain.
Keyword : Execution, Decision, Attorney, Forgery of Letter
Â
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
A. Buku-Buku
Adami Chazawi, 2005, Kejahatan Mengenai Pemalsuan, Pt Raja Grafindo.
Andi Hamzah, 2010, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Bambang Purnomo, 1998, Orientasi Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Amarta, yogyakarta.
Bambang Sugono, 2013, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.
Burhan Ashofa, 2010, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Leden Marpaung, 2009, asas-teori-Praktek Hukum Acara Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, dikutip dari Tirta Midjaja, Pokok-pokok Hukum Pidana, Jakarta.
Petrus Iwan Panjaitan dan Padopotan Simonangkir, 1995, Lembaga Permasyarakatan Dalam Prepektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Jakarta, Sinar Harapan.
Rusli Muhamad, 2006, Potret Lembaga Pengadilan Indonesia, PT Raja Grafindo Perseda, Jakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 1990, Peneletian Hukum Normatif suatu tinjauan Singkat, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Zainudin Ali, 2013, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Peraturan Hukum Acara Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman Republik Indonesia
C. Sumber Lain
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 136/Pid.B/2015/PN.Pdg
