ANALISA YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 43/PUU-XllI/2015 TERHADAP PENYELEKSIAN HAKIM DI INDONESIA
Abstract
Constitutional Court Decision No. 43 / PUU-XIII / 2015 has an impact on the selection of Judges of the State Administrative Court because the Constitutional Court's decision to eliminate the authority of the Judicial Commission to be involved in the selection process of judges at the first level. Formulation of the issues to be addressed are: (1) How are the procedure of selecting the State Administrative Court Judge before the release of the decision from the Constitutional Court Number 43 / PUU-XIII / 2015? (2) How are the legal implications of the decision from the Constitutional Court Number 43 / PUU-XIII / 2015 against the selection of the State Administrative Court Judge (Administrative Court)? The author conducted research with normative legal research methods. The data used is secondary data with the use of primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary. The collection of legal materials are using studied document technique. Legal materials from documents studied by analyzed deductively using analysis qualitative. Research results: 1) Selection of Procedure State Administrative Court Judge (Administrative Court) before the release of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 43 / PUU-XIII / 2015 is Exam Pre-Position, Program Training, Internships, Exam of the Code of Ethics and Conduct of Judges and Determination of Completion. 2) The Legal Implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 43 / PUU-XIII / 2015 against the Selection of the State Administrative Court Judge (Administrative Court), which eliminates most of the oversight function of the Judicial Commission and make the Supreme Court  as the only institution authorized to recruit judges.
 Keywords: Juridical Analysis, Selection, Judge of the Constitutional Court Decision
Â
References
Daftar Pustaka
A. Buku-buku
A. Ahsin Tohari, 2004, Komisi Yudisial dan Reformasi Peradilan, ELSAM, Jakarta.
Andi Hamzah, 1996, KUHP dan KUHAP, Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.
Bambang Sunggono, 1998, Metodologi Penelitan Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Burhan Ashofa, 2010, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Indroharto,1993, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, CV Mulia Sari, Jakarta.
Taufiqurrohman Syahuri, 2013, Sistem Rekrutmen Hakim Berdasarkan Tiga Undang-Undang Bidang Peradilan Tahun 2009 Untuk Mewujudkan Peradilan Bersih, Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung.
Kartini Kartono, 1996, Pengantar Metode dan Riset Sosial, Manjar Maju, Bandung.
Nanda Agung Dewantoro, 1987, Masalah Kebebasan Hakim dalam Menangani Suatu Perkara Pidana, Aksara Persada: Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1983, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
W. Riawan Tjandra, 1999, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, yogyakarta. Unuversitas atma jaya.
B. PeraturanPerundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 Tentang Mahkamah Agung
Undang-Undang Nomor 49 Tahun 2009 Tentang Peradilan Umum
Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 Tentang Peradilan Agama
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara
Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986
