EXPRESSIVE UTTERANCE FOUND IN GARY SMITH CHANNEL FA’A SAMOAN: SAMOAN WAY

Authors

  • Muhammad Fattah Arrazaq Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Temmy Thamrin Universitas Bung Hatta

Keywords:

Fa’a Samoa: Samoa Way, forms of expressive speech, categories of expressive speech.

Abstract

This thesis discusses the expressive utterances used by all participants in the Gary Smith Channel Fa’a Samoa: Samoan Way program. The purpose of this research is to identify the categories of expressive speech and to find the Structural forms of expressive speech. The research data consisted of expressive utterances that were collected and selected using the listening method using the free engagement speaking technique and the note-taking technique (Cornell). All expressive utterances were listened to Gary Smith Channel Fa’a Samoa: Samoan Way program and transcribed directly by the writer. The data were analyzed using the pragmatic equivalent method and connecting it with the theory of expressive speech forms proposed by Yule (1996) and Shopen (2007), the theory of categories of expressive speech by Ronan (2015), and the theory of context by Leech (1983). The results of the data analysis were presented in a descriptive form and analyzed argumentatively and summarized in a table. The results of data analysis found expressive forms of speech, namely declarative form, exclamation form, imperative form interrogative form. The dominance form of expressive speech used is the declarative form because all participants in this video often give statements to express their feelings. The categories of expressive speech found are Agreement, Disagreement, Volition, Thanking, Apologizing, Non-directed Complaints in Exclamations, Sorrow, and Greetings. The category of expressive speech that was dominantly used was volition because all participants often expressed their wish to see what happen next from Chief Sielu Avea.

References

Aguert, M., et al., (2010).Understanding Expressive Speech Acts: The Role of Prosody and Situational Context in French-Speaking 5-to 9-YearOlds.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. Vol. 53, 16291641A, Dec. 2010. Retrieved from http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org

Austin, J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Word. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Fromkin, V., & Rodman, R. (1993). An Introduction to Language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

Leech. G. N.(1983). Principle of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.

Levinson, S. C. (1994). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Macnamara, C. (2012). Screw you! & thank you. Journal of Philosophy Study, the University of California at Riverside, 163:893-914. DOI: 10.1007/s11098012-9995- 3. Retrieved on April 28, 2016.

Ronan, P. (2015). Categorizing Expressive Speech Acts in the Pragmatically Annotated SPICE Ireland Corpus. ICAME Journal, De Gruyter, Vol. 39, 2015. DOI: 10.1515/icame-2015-0002. Retrieved on April 28, 2016.

Searle, J. R. (1976). Speech Acts. London: Syndics of the Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Shopen, T. (2007). Language Typology and Syntactic Description, second edition, volume I: clause structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sudaryanto.(1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: an Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman Group Limited.

Yule, G.(1996). Pragmatics. USA: Oxford University Press

Downloads

Published

2023-09-05