PSYCHOLOGICAL CONFLICTS OF THE MAIN CHARACTER IN THE WHALE

Authors

  • Syifa Jefra Kusa Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Femmy Dahlan Universitas Bung Hatta

Keywords:

psychological conflict, valence, The Whale, Charlie

Abstract

This research analyzes the psychological conflicts of the main character, Charlie, in the movie The Whale and how he resolves the conflicts. The writer employs Kurt Lewin's theory of conflicts, which divides conflict into three categories: approach-approach conflict, approach-avoidance conflict, and avoidance-avoidance conflict. Furthermore, Kurt Lewin defines valence as decision making or the resolution of psychological conflicts, which is divided into 3 types, there are positive valence, negative valence, and neutral valence. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method. According to the findings, Charlie's most common experience is approach-avoidance conflict, which occurred 10 times. This form of conflict arises when Charlie is torn between desire and the consequences. The writer also discovered two cases of approach-approach conflict, in which Charlie must pick between two positive results, as well as three instances of avoidance-avoidance conflict, in which he is forced to select between two undesirable possibilities. Meanwhile, for resolutions, the findings show that Charlie dominantly resolves his conflicts with negative valence, mostly when he faces approach avoidance conflict. He also resolves conflicts with positive valence, with 4 data found in this study. However, the writer found neutral valence appears 2 times. In conclusion, this finding shows that Charlie often lets his emotions control his choices, especially when it comes to Ellie. He believes that taking care of her, even from a distance, is more important than taking care of himself. This explains why he often resolves approach-avoidance conflicts with negative valence, when he wants something but knows it has bad consequences, he follows his emotions instead of logic.

References

Bruno, F. J. (2002). Psychology: A Self-Teaching Guide. John Wiley & Sons.

Ciesielska, M., Boström, K. W., & Öhlander, M. (2017). Observation methods. Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies, 2, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3_2

D. Hunter, S. (2022). THE WHALE.

Darren, A. (2022). THE WHALE. In Protozoa Pictures.

Deutsch, M. (1999). Some definitions. OECD Observer, 216, 19. https://doi.org/10.7312/brow91410-010

Ehrlich, C., & Fasbender, U. (2016). Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8

Levinger, G. (2015). Kurt Lewin’s approach to conflict and its resolution A review with some extensions. Coflict Resolution, 1(4), 229–339.

Lewin, K. (1935). A Dynamic Theory Of Personality.

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on research methods: Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g

Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n12

Sverdlik, N. (2012). The Content of Internal Conflicts: A Personal Values Perspective. European Journal of Personality, 26(March 2011), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/per

Von Franz, M.-L. (1980). Analytical Psychology and Literary Criticism. New Literary Hystory, 12(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004490123_040

Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1949). Theory of Literature. 0–424. http://www.archive.org/details/theoryofliteratuOOinwell

Downloads

Published

2025-03-25