JURDICAL ANALYSIS OF DISTRICITADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF PADANG’S VERDICT NO: 11/ G / 2017 PTUN.PDG IN THE CASE OD DISCHARGE OF H.ERISMAN, S.E AS THE HEAD OF REGIONAL HOUSE OF PADANG 2014-2019

Abstract

ABSTRACT
The settlement of Internally disputed Political Parties in regulated in the section 32 of Law
Number 2 of 2011 on Political Partical Party. In the Verrdict Number.11/G/2017 PTUN.PDG
the defedant issued a decree of the governor of west sumatera Numer : 171-578-2017 on the
inauguration of the retrenchement and appointment of the leadership of the house of
representatives of the municipality of padang, Time remaining depertmant of 2014-2019, june
14 2017. Problem Formulation : (1) Is the dismissal of H, Erisman, SE as the head of DPRD
Padang Coty from 2014 ; 2019 in accordancr with the Provinsions Of legaslation ? (2) How is
the consideration of the panel of judge who tried the case Number 11/ G/2017/PTUN.PDG
between H.Erisman, SE as the Provinces of west sumatera as the defendant ? the research that
refers to the theories and doctrine proposed by the experts. The data sources are primary legal,
secondary legal and tertiar legal datas. This paper is library research, the data are analyzed
normativley and qualitatevly. At the end, it can be concluded that (1) H. Erisman,SE dismissal
as head of the Padang city DPRD of the Period 2014 - 2019 was not in the laws and
regulations the panel of judges consider that (a) not yet thought the Procedure of the party
court. (b) the term of his term has not expired
Keywords :Analysis, PTUN decision, discharge, DPRD’s leader