IMPLEMENTASI DOKTRIN VICARIOUS LIABILITY DALAM PERKARA KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS (Studi Kasus Perkara No. 70 Pdt.G/2006/ PN.Pdg)
Abstract
Vicarious liability in principle is a refinement and deepening of the regulative principle of juridical moral is in certain respects a person's perceived responsibility should extend to the acts of his subordinates who do work or act for him or within the limits of his command. There are two important requirements that must be met in order to apply a criminal act with which vicarious liability there must be a relationship such as employment relationship between employer and employee or worker and criminal acts committed by an employee or worker must be related or are still within the scope of his work. Implementation or application of the doctrine of vicarious liability in the case of a traffic accident in the jurisdiction of the District Court of Class IA Champaign divided into civil liability and criminal liability. Perpetrators of criminal responsibility ditanggug by traffic accidents and losses incurred are borne by the actors who work. While consideration of the judge applying the doctrine of vicarious liability is the working relationship between the perpetrator traffic accident that Defendant C as a truck driver with Defendant A, the employer of Defendant C and the work done was within the scope of employment as a truck driver Defendant A. This can be seen in decision No Traffic Accident Case. 70 Pdt.G/2006 / PN.Pdg Jurisdiction in the District Court of Class IA Champaign.
Keywords: Implementasi, Vicarius Liability, Traffic Accidents
References
A. Buku
Abdul Wahab Solichin, 2004, Analisis Kebijakan dari Formulasi ke Implementasi Kebijaksanaan Negara, Edisi Kedua, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Adami Chazawi, 2001, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 1, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Andi Matalatta, 1987, “Santunan bagi korban” dalam J.E. sahetapy (ed.)…Victimilogy sebuah Bunga rampai 9 (Jakarta: Pustaka sinar Harapan.
Amir Hyas, 2012, Asas Asas Hukum Pidana, Rangkang Education, Makassar.
Amiruddin, dkk., 2004, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada.
A.Z Abidin, 1983, Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.
Bambang Waluyo, 1991, Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
Bambang Poernomo, 1991, Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.
B. Bosu, 1982, Sendi-Sendi Kriminologi, Usaha Nasional, Surabaya.
Djoko Prakoso, 1987, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia . Edisi Pertama , Yogyakarta, Liberty Yogyakarta.
Schaffmeister et.al. 2004, Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta, Liberti.
Erdianto Effendi, 2011, Hukum Pidana Indonesia Suatu Pengantar, Refika Aditama, Bandung.
H.S. Djajusman, 1976, Polisi Dan Lalu Lintas, Mabak, Bandung.
Loebby Loqman, 1991, Beberapa Ikwal di Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 1971 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,1991, Datacom, Jakarta.
Muladi dan Dwidja Priyatno, 1991, Pertanggungjawaban Koorporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana, Sekolah Tinggi Bandung.
M. Hamdan, 2008, Pembaharuan Hukum Tentang Alasan Penghapusan Pidana, Medan.
O.C. Kaligis, Kumpulan Kasus Menarik Jilid 2, 2007,O.C. Kaligis & Associates Jakarta.
