CAPAIAN KINERJA BIAYA PROYEK BANGUNAN AIR (Studi Kasus Pada Proyek Bangunan Air Kantor Balai Wilayah Sungai Sumatera V)

Authors

  • Desrinur .
  • Zaidir .
  • Yusrizal Bakar

Abstract

The construction project is a dynamic field and risky. Risk can impact the productivity,
performance, quality and cost of the project and limitations. Risk can be said to be a result that
may occur unexpectedly. Although some activities have been planned as possible, but still
contains uncertainties that will be run entirely according to plan. Risk on construction projects
however can not be eliminated but can be reduced or transferred from one party to the other
party.When the risk of disruption will have an impact on the overall performance of the project
so that it can cause harm to the cost, time and quality of work. The actors in the construction
industry is now increasingly aware of the importance of considering the problem of risk on
projects handled, due to errors in predicting and addressing the risk would have a negative
impact, either directly or indirectly in the construction project. Moving on from this condition,
the need for an analysis relating to the initial objectives of the risk management of construction
projects aimed at reducing the risk and impact of risk will occur. This study aims to find risk
factors suspected of having an influence on the achievement of the performance cost of the
project is based on the stages of planning, implementation and evaluation. The results of the
analysis using regression equation concluded that there are four dimensions of forty who
successfully identified as a cause of low performance cost performance on projects
implemented last three years, including: restrictions (constraints) project unclear and confusing
(x2); poor communication with stakeholders (x18); a mistake in choosing a provider that does
not have competence (x20); and management of poor materials, relating to the procurement,
use and storage of materials (x24). Overall these four variables have a significant effect of
88.3% and the remainder caused by other variables, while the level of risk posed 19.8%
obtained results for the variable X18, 18.9% for the variable x2, 18:06% for x20 and 18:04%
variable to variable x24. Overall level of risk these four variables will have an impact on the
achievement of performance fee is equal to 74.80%.
Keywords: Cost Performance, Risk Level Project

References

Anonim,1986 StandarPerencanaan Irigasi,

Direktorat Jenderal Pengairan,

Departemen Pekerjaan Umum Republik

Indonesia

Asiyanto. (2005), Construction Project Cost

Management, PT Pradnya Paramita,

Jakarta

Barrie, D.S., dan Paulson, B.C., 1995,

Manajemen Konstruksi Profesional,

Erlangga, Jakarta.

Carper, Kenneth L. ed. 1989.Forensic

Engineering.Elsevier Science

Publishers. New York.

Dendarlianto (2007) “Model Prediksi

Sukses Proyek Dengan Kriteria

Dokumen Pasca Kualifikasi Kontraktor”

(Studi Kasus di Kota Kupang Propinsi

Nusa Tenggara Timur), Politeknik

Negeri Kupang NTT

Duffield, C & Trigunarsyah, B. 1999.

Project Management-Conception to

Completion. Engineering Education

Australia. (EEA). Australia.

Ervianto,A.U dan Joshua, M. (2001).

Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi. Andi,

Yogyakarta.

Fisk, E.R.1997. Construction Project

Administration Fifth Edition. Prentice

Hall. New Jersey.

Flanagan, R & Norman, G.1993, Risk

Management and Construction.

Blackwell Science, London

G.S. Birdie, Ram Chandra DAS, 1988,

IrrigationEngineering, Dhanpat Rai &

SONS.

Heri Suprapto, Hendro Prabowo dan Relly

Andayani. 2005. Decision Support

System (DSS) untuk evaluasi teknik

pada Prakualifikasi Kontraktor.

Information Technology. Teknik Sipil

Universitas Gunadarma, Jakarta

Kangari, R. (1995). ”Risk Management

Perceptions and Trends of U.S.

Construction.” J. Construction

Engineering Manage.

Oyfer (2002) Essentials of Management 3rd

ed McGraw-Hill. New York.

Project Management. Body of Knowledge.

Third Edition. (PMBOK® Guide) an

American National Standard.

ANSI/PMI 99-001-2004

Kerzmer, 1995, Hydraulic Structure, Unwin

Hyman, London.

R.S. Varshney, Gupta 1979, Theory &

Design of Irrigation Structure Volume

II, NEM Chand & Bros Roorkel.

Ray K Linslay, Joseph B Franzui, Djoko

Sasongko, 1986, Teknik Sumber Daya

Air, Erlangga.

Soeharto, Iman. 1999. Manajemen Proyek:

Dari Konseptual Sampai Operasional,

Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sunaryo dkk, 2005. Pengelolaan Sumber

Daya Air.

Soenarmo, S.H., (2009), Penginderaan Jauh

Dan Pengenalan Sistem Informasi

Geografi Untuk Bidang Ilmu Kebumian,

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia.

Nomor 7 Tahun 2004. Tentang Sumber

Daya Air

Sudjarwadi, 1992, Dasar-dasar Teknik

Irigasi, Pusat Antar Universitas Ilmu

Teknik, Universitas Gajah Mada.

Suyono Sosrodarsono, Kensaku Takeda,

, Bendungan Tipe Urugan, PT.

Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.

USBR, 1974, Design of Small Dam, Oxford

& IBN Publishing Co., New Delhi, India

Wieke Yuni Christina (2012) “Pengaruh

Budaya Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan

Kerja (K3) Terhadap Kinerja Proyek

Konstruksi” Jurusan Teknik Sipil,

Fakultas Teknik Universitas Brawijaya

Malang.

Published

2015-07-02