PENGARUH KONFLIK PERAN, BUDAYA ORGANISASI DAN MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI SEKRETARIAT DAERAH KOTA SUNGAI PENUH DENGAN KEPUASAN KERJA SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING
Abstract
This study aim to identify and analyze direct effect of role conflict, organizational culture, work motivation to work satisfaction. This study attempted to confirm the two factor theory (Herzberg, 1968). Direct effect of role conflict, organizational culture, work motivation, work satisfaction to employee performance. Indirect effect of role conflict, organizational culture, work motivation to employee performance at Regional Secretariat Sungai Penuh through work satisfaction as intervening variable.This study using causality design. Object of this study is all of employee of Regional Secretariat Sungai Penuh amounted 113 peoples. Data analysis using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the help of AMOS software v. 19.Result of the study found that: 1.) Role conflict effect no significant on work satisfaction, 2) Organizational culture effect significant positive on work satisfaction, 3) Work motivation effect significant positive on work satisfaction, 4) Role conflict effect significant negative on performance, 5) Organizational Culture no significant positive effect on performance 6) Work motivation significant positive effect on performance, 7) Work satisfaction significant positive effect on performance, 8) Role Conflict not significant effect on performance through work satisfaction as intervening variable, 9) Organizational Culture not significant positive effect on performance through work satisfaction as intervening variable, 10) Work motivation significant positive effect on performance through work satisfaction as intervening variable
Keywords: Role conflict, Organizational Culture, Work Motivation, Work Satisfaction, Employee Performance
References
Ghozali, Imam. 2011, Model Persamaan: Konsep dan Aplikasi Dengan Program AMOS 19. Jakarta: Erlangga
Hasibuan, Melayu S.P. 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Herzberg, F. 1968. One more time: how do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review (January-February): 53-62
Kreitner dan Kinicki. 2005. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta. Salemba empat
Luthans, Fred. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Yogyakarta : Andi
Mahsun, Muhamad., 2006, Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik, Yogyakarta : BPFE
Makmuri, Muchlas. 2005. Perilaku Organisasi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University
Mangkunegara, Anwar, Prabu, 2009. Evaluasi Kinerja SDM, Cetakan 4, Bandung : Refika Aditama
Mas’ud, Fuad 2004. Survai Diagnosis Organissional : Konsep dan Aplikasi. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
Pabundu, Tika. 2008. Budaya Organisasi dan Peningkatan Kinerja Perusahaan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Riduwan. 2007, Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Bandung : Alfabeta
Rivai, Veithzal dan Sagala, Ella Jauvani. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan : Dari Teori ke Praktek. Jakarta : PT. Rajagrafindo Persada
Robbins, Stephen P. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi kesepuluh. Jakarta: Indeks Kelompok Gramedia
Sedarmayanti, 2004, Good Governance (Kepemerintahan Yang Baik), Bandung : Mandar Maju
Siagian, Sondang. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (cetakan 15). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Sopiah. 2008. Perilaku Organisasi. Yogyakarta : Andi
Tampubolon, Manahan P, 2003. Perilaku Keorganisasian, Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia
Umam, Khaerul. 2010. Perilaku Organisasi. Bandung: Pustaka Setia